Answer:
D. Specialist Species
<h2>
What is the advantage for species to be specialists, and how can they survive in the presence of opportunistic/generalist species?</h2>
In the setting of specialized habitats or unique situations, specialized species exist. When those conditions and surroundings change, they must adapt or go extinct, thus they must survive while they still exist.
When compared to generalists, they have the benefit of efficiency, which increases the likelihood of survival and, hence, reproduction within certain settings or situations. The generalists, on the other hand, have the benefit of being able to survive in a larger variety of circumstances and have a higher probability of doing so.
Cactuses, which are plants adapted to dry environments, are an example of specialization. More generalist plant species would typically outcompete cacti in most habitats on Earth, but very few of such species could endure the harsh conditions of a desert.
Extreme environmental conditions, competition for limited resources, and "evolutionary arms races" are some of the pressures that cause specialization. Cheetahs sprint quickly both because their prey moves quickly and because quicker cheetahs will be more effective hunters and more likely to procreate. The advantage of specialization is clear when seen from the standpoint of catching the next meal on a daily basis.
My key argument is that specialization's benefits must always be viewed in the context of the environment that generated the selective pressure that resulted in specialization. Although experts are specialists because they must be, their specializations put them in danger.
Answer:
the answer is D) does not require energy from ATP to take place.
Explanation:
Passive transport doesn't require energy (ATP), active transport does require energy. Passive transport moves molecules WITH the concentration gradient (high to low), while active transport moves molecules AGAINST the concentration gradient (Low to High).
Mark me brainliest
A physical change is a change which only affects the form of a substance, but not its chemical composition. So, a physical change in terms of particle arrangement states that particles do not change apart from gaining or losing energy. It can be explained using the examples of freezing and melting.
When a substance is solid, its particles like atoms and molecules are very tightly packed. These cannot move freely but when a substance is in liquid or gaseous state, the particles are loosely packed and can move freely. So when water is solid the particles are tight but when it is in liquid state same particles can move faster. Hence, particles are same but their energy has changed.
I think the answer is B,A,E
I would say A. Mainly because the teacher is well trained for situation where it's critical or something like that..