Trench warfare was the main style of war during World War I. It consisted of both sides of the war, called fronts, digging trenches in the ground for their soldiers to live and fight in. Trenches were deep ditches dug in the ground that were often cramped and dirty. As the dug trenches further forward, they would take more land in the battle.
This was a very slow process and often would result in tens of thousands of casualties for a few yards of land. This is especially true because of the heavy use of mounted machine guns that both sides of the war used. These guns would tear through enemies easily. This style of warfare was also vulnerable to bombings and gas attacks, as the soldiers were stuck in the trenches and the heavy poisonous gasses would sink into the trenches.
They were they were strong rulers and they were interested in conquests.
<h3>Who are mauriyan rulers?</h3>
Chandragupta Maurya founded the Maurya Empire, also known as the Mauryan Empire, in 322 BCE, and it lasted until 185 BCE in a loosely organized state. It was a geographically vast ancient Indian Iron Age literal power in South Asia with its center in Magadha.
The Indo-Gangetic Plain was forced under the control of the Maurya Empire, whose megacity capital was Pataliputra ( ultramodern Patna).
The loyalty of the military leaders in charge of the fortified metropolises that dot the conglomerate's territory outside of this Homeric nucleus determined its geographic reach.
Following the submission of a portion of India by Alexander the Great, the Mauryan Empire was founded in 321 BCE.
Three important emperors served as the strong leaders are Chandragupta Maurya (321–298 BCE), Bindusara (298–272 BCE), and Ashoka (272- 232 BCE).
To learn more about Maurya Empire, refer
brainly.com/question/24535589
#SPJ4
Answer:historian's
Explanation:
Took the test and put this as the answer and got it correct.
Lowcountry (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1998) and coeditor (with Sean Hawkins) of Black Experience and the Empire: The Oxford History of the British Empire (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004). He would like to acknowledge in particular the assistance of David Brion Davis, who generously sent him two early chapters from his forthcoming manuscript, "Inhuman Bondage: The Rise and Fall of New World Slavery."
Explanation:
Answer:
Slavery is often termed "the peculiar institution," but it was hardly peculiar to the United States. Almost every society in the history of the world has experienced slavery at one time or another. The aborigines of Australia are about the only group that has so far not revealed a past mired in slavery—and perhaps the omission has more to do with the paucity of the evidence than anything else. To explore American slavery in its full international context, then, is essentially to tell the history of the globe. That task is not possible in the available space, so this essay will explore some key antecedents of slavery in North America and attempt to show what is distinctive or unusual about its development. The aim is to strike a balance between identifying continuities in the institution of slavery over time while also locating significant changes. The trick is to suggest preconditions, anticipations, and connections without implying that they were necessarily determinations (1).
