All categories

2 years ago

Anyone know these, I’m confused?

Mathematics

2 answers:

alisha [4.7K]2 years ago

5 0

Tuv is equal to 127

Snowcat [4.5K]2 years ago

3 0

Answer:m<TUW is also 127°

Step-by-step explanation:

QS and TV are parallel so the angles given are corresponding angles, and corresponding angles are congruent

You might be interested in

0.00084 in scientific notation

enyata [817]

.00084 in scientific notation is 8.4 × 10^-4

7 0

2 years ago

If 1/10 of a scarf is knit in 48 minutes.what fraction of a scarf is knit in 1 hour

Andrew [12]

Answer:

1/8

Step-by-step explanation:

i believe this is the answer

4 0

1 year ago

HELP ITS URGENT WILL MARK BRAINLEST

sesenic [268]

= 16 * 10^13

which in scientific notation is 1.6 * 10^14

7 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

At one point the average price of regular unleaded gasoline was $3.41 per gallon. Assume that the standard deviation price per

Aleonysh [2.5K]

Answer:

a) $1-\frac{1}{k^2} =1- \frac{1}{2^2}= 1-0.25 = 0.75$

So we expected about 75% within two deviations from the mean

b) $1-\frac{1}{k^2} =1- \frac{1}{1.5^2}= 1-0.4444 = 0.556$

So we expected about 55.6% within 1.5 deviations from the mean

And the limits are:

$Lower = 3.41 -1.5*0.09 = 3.275$

$Upper = 3.41 +1.5*0.09 = 3.545$

c) We can calculate how many deviations we are within the mean with the limits with this formula:

$z =\frac{x-\mu}{\sigma}$

And using the lower limit we got:

$z = \frac{3.05-3.41}{0.09}=-4$

And with the upper limit we got:

$z = \frac{3.77-3.41}{0.09}=4$

So then the value of k =4 and the percentage is given by:

$1-\frac{1}{k^2} =1- \frac{1}{4^2}= 1-0.0625 = 0.9375$

Step-by-step explanation:

Previous concepts and Data given

$\mu =3.41$ reprsent the population mean

$\sigma=0.09$ represent the population standard deviation

The Chebyshev's Theorem states that for any dataset

• We have at least 75% of all the data within two deviations from the mean.

• We have at least 88.9% of all the data within three deviations from the mean.

• We have at least 93.8% of all the data within four deviations from the mean.

Or in general words "For any set of data (either population or sample) and for any constant k greater than 1, the proportion of the data that must lie within k standard deviations on either side of the mean is at least: $1-\frac{1}{k^2}$

Part a

For this case we can find the percentage required replaincg k =2 and we got:

$1-\frac{1}{k^2} =1- \frac{1}{2^2}= 1-0.25 = 0.75$

So we expected about 75% within two deviations from the mean

Part b

For this case we can find the percentage required replaincg k =2 and we got:

$1-\frac{1}{k^2} =1- \frac{1}{1.5^2}= 1-0.4444 = 0.556$

So we expected about 55.6% within 1.5 deviations from the mean

And the limits are:

$Lower = 3.41 -1.5*0.09 = 3.275$

$Upper = 3.41 +1.5*0.09 = 3.545$

Part c

We can calculate how many deviations we are within the mean with the limits with this formula:

$z =\frac{x-\mu}{\sigma}$

And using the lower limit we got:

$z = \frac{3.05-3.41}{0.09}=-4$

And with the upper limit we got:

$z = \frac{3.77-3.41}{0.09}=4$

So then the value of k =4 and the percentage is given by:

$1-\frac{1}{k^2} =1- \frac{1}{4^2}= 1-0.0625 = 0.9375$

3 0

2 years ago

Relatively few (7.6%) high school students said that they rarely or never wore a seat belt, whereas 41.4% reported having texted

Lubov Fominskaja [6]

Answer:

Check Explanation

Step-by-step explanation:

The amygdala is the brain's emotional center. It is responsible for instinctual thinking and impulse control. It develops during early teenage years and this means the amygdala is not developed to the optimal level during teenage years. This makes teenagers very prone to impulsive behavior.

Also, the prefrontal cortex which is responsible for decision-making skills and the ability to measure risks is not fully developed in the teenage child stage. This is why teenagers make poor decisions and aren't great at measuring risks thereby making riskier choices like using the phone while driving.

These two brain components are fully developed in adults hence, it is less likely for adults to make poor decisions like texting while driving, which is a riskier thing to do than not using a seatbelt.

Again, teenagers have this invincibility feeling where they feel like they are more active and can react faster to road dangers. This deceives them into making such riskier decisions.

The current world also has turned into something else where people (teenagers especially) strive to get the most current news information as they are happening. The need to stay connected to social media is another reason why teenagers can't stay off their phones.

Finally, the fact that public intervention programs and ad campaigns promoting seat-belt use way more than not using cell-phones use while driving also mean more people are more conscious about using seatbelts while driving than not using their cellphones. In recent times, the campaigns, laws and bans on use of phones while driving are just gaining prominence.

In conclusion, the combination of all these factors/reasons is why the percentage of teenage high school students who use phones while driving is way more than the percentage that don't use a seatbelt although texting while driving is arguably much riskier than not wearing a seat belt.

Hope this Helps!!!

5 0

2 years ago