Historian Rayford Logan introduced the idea that the <em>nadir</em> of American race relations took place from the end of Reconstruction in 1877 until the early 20th century. What he meant was that the social and political conditions of that period, made racial tensions grow throughout the country reaching an all-time peak.
His views have been largely supported, as during those years <u>African Americans lost most civil rights they had gained in the Reconstruction</u>. The black community suffered from physical attacks, institutional segregation, and discrimination by the legal system. Alongside these outrageous conditions, a growing expression of white supremacy started to become the norm. Not only African-Americans suffered the consequences, as <u>the chinese community was also impacted by the same kind of violence</u> and institutionalized racism, culminating in the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882.
Hope this helps!
Events in American history in chronological order are:
- Coercive Acts
- 1st Continental Congress
- 2nd Continental Congress
- Declaration of Independence
- Battle for New York
- Burgoyne’s Surrender at Saratoga
- Franco-American Alliance
- Greene’s campaign in the South
- Battle of Yorktown
- Treaty of Paris
<h3>How did the U.S. gain independence?</h3>
After the Coercive Acts of 1774, the 1st Continental Congress met to decide what to do. The 2nd Continental Congress followed a year later and the Declaration of Independence came in 1776.
The Battle of New York took place in 1776 and 1777 and Burgoyne’s Surrendered at Saratoga which led to the French allying with the Americans.
The Battle of Yorktown virtually signaled American victory which was solidified by the Treaty of Paris.
Find out more on the Coercive Acts at brainly.com/question/10362829.
#SPJ1
Answer:
I'm thinking adjective but I'm not sure
Explanation:
Answer: Refusing to hand over the White House tapes
Explanation: What were the three reasons that Nixon gave for refusing to turn over the White House tapes? Nixon stated that the dispute was between the president and special prosecutor, making it an executive branch conflict and not for judicial resolution. He also stated that it was up to the president, and not the court, to confirm the scope of the executive privilege. The need for for executive confidentiality justified his privilege in this case
took test -100%
