Answer:
B). Able to successfully sue the reporter for intrusion if the homeowner did not give the reporter permission to be in the house.
Explanation:
As per the given description, the homeowner would probably be 'able to sue the reporter successfully for intruding if the homeowner himself didn't allow the reporter to be present in the house' as the reporter entered the house without the permission of the home's owner but rather entered with the permission of the firefighters. Since the house belongs to the owner he/she possess the legal rights to sue any person for intrusion who has engulfed his/her house without prior permission. Therefore, <u>option B</u> is the correct answer.
I’m am fairly certain this is called Cassgender.
Answer:
What follows is a bill of indictment. Several of these items end up in the Bill of Rights. Others are addressed by the form of the government established—first by the Articles of Confederation, and ultimately by the Constitution.
The assumption of natural rights expressed in the Declaration of Independence can be summed up by the following proposition: “First comes rights, then comes government.” According to this view: (1) the rights of individuals do not originate with any government, but preexist its formation; (2) the protection of these rights is the first duty of government; and (3) even after government is formed, these rights provide a standard by which its performance is measured and, in extreme cases, its systemic failure to protect rights—or its systematic violation of rights—can justify its alteration or abolition; (4) at least some of these rights are so fundamental that they are “inalienable,” meaning they are so intimately connected to one’s nature as a human being that they cannot be transferred to another even if one consents to do so. This is powerful stuff.
At the Founding, these ideas were considered so true as to be self-evident. However, today the idea of natural rights is obscure and controversial. Oftentimes, when the idea comes up, it is deemed to be archaic. Moreover, the discussion by many of natural rights, as reflected in the Declaration’s claim that such rights “are endowed by their Creator,” leads many to characterize natural rights as religiously based rather than secular. As I explain in The Structure of Liberty: Justice and the Rule of Law, I believe his is a mistake.
Answer 4 is the correct one.
Complicated instruments can possibly produce unreliable data depending on if they were used correctly, but they don't always do so.
Simple instruments like rulers can produce unreliable data if the data required is extremely precise, such as decimal measurements, but larger measurement values are typically fine.
More expensive equipment doesn't necessarily mean that it's better, it's just what the manufacturer decided to price the equipment at.
Depending on the situation, different equipment can be better, from a ruler to a caliper.
One of the goals of the <u>a) Causal</u> research is to understand the influence of the independent <u>variables</u> on the dependent <u>variable</u>.
<h3>What is causal research?</h3>
Unlike descriptive research, which describes what is going on or what exists, causal research or “experimental study” is designed to determine whether one or more variables (independent variables) cause or affect the value of another variable (dependent variable).
An independent variable is a variable that the researcher changes to determine the dependent variable.
<h3>Answer Options</h3>
a) Causal research
b) Probability sampling
c) Descriptive research
d) Exploratory research
e) Nonprobability sampling
Thus, one of the goals of the <u>a) Causal</u> research is to understand the influence of the independent <u>variables</u> on the dependent <u>variable</u>.
Learn more about causal research at brainly.com/question/8051473
