These explanations "make people feel safer and the
world more comprehensible".
The just-world hypothesis otherwise
called just world fallacy is the cognitive inclination or supposition that a
man's activities are innately disposed to convey ethically reasonable and
fitting results to that individual, to the finish of every honorable activity
being in the end compensated and every insidious activity inevitably rebuffed.
Answer:
Mischel proposed that behaviors are determined mostly by "SITUATIONAL CUES". Up to that point, psychologists in his field had believed that "TRAITS" were responsible for a person’s behavior. Mischel’s idea has come to be called "MISCHEL'S COGNITIVE-AFFECTIVE PERSONALITY MODEL", and the debate over it is known as the "PERSON"/situation debate.
Explanation:
Previously existing trait theories suggests that a person's behavior depends on his/her traits, and they are consistent in different situations.
Walter Mischel criticized this theory and suggests that the way people behave is determined by the situation they find themselves in, and not just the traits they possess. His idea is known as "Mischel's cognitive-affective personality model".
The debate between Mischel and the proponent of trait theories is called the "trait vs state" or the Person-Situation debate.
Answer: Qualitative data collection
Explanation:
Qualitative data collection involves combining two or more data collection method in a research. Examining meanings attached to behaviours would lead to a Qualitative type of data collection.
i believe the answer is: Fuel filter
Fuel filter is a part of your vehicles that screens out various form of small particles from the fuel (such as dirts). Every 15,000 miles, there would be a chance that your fuel filter is clogged. If this fuel filter is not changed, it would be hard for you to start your car.
The primary crime scene would be the locker room. This is because they can scan the employee's locker for finger prints and other evidence of who might have been the one to take the keys.
The case that established that police must obtain a search warrant to make additional visits to a crime scene was Mincey v the State of Arizona which made it's way to the supreme court on <span>June 21, 1978.</span>