A person can think however they want. Actions, like many have said, define a person in the end. Someone can advocate for peace with malicious intent, but they will still likely be remembered for advocating peace and not for their impure motivations. If these contradicting images are revealed to the public, that is still an act against that person, and is no longer a thought.
However, this is only from the public's view. When it comes to people, they may as well be the embodiment of their thoughts. Everything is fueled by something. The same person who seeds their own goals under the guise of peace will not think of themselves as one who acts with the intentions of bringing peace. They will be looking to call forth whatever it is that they want, and be aware that what they present to the public is not the truth.
So, both points are arguable. It depends on whether you value the individual or the community. Actions are what are remembered, and thoughts are a person's reason. Even today, this comes into relevancy because people want to know why certain figures in history did what they did. Thoughts make a person human, after all. Without thought, seperation of man and beast would be nigh impossible. Without action, man would have been left behind long ago. Both thought and action are important indeed.
Answer: This is the best I cold do if it is not what you are looking for sorry:)
Explanation: CPB seeks to make public broadcasting more accessible to the public it serves. To do so CPB maintains a toll-free, 24-hour telephone line (1-800-272-2190), an online contact form, and accepts letters sent directly to CPB.
All comments are available on this website to be viewed by the general public. Each year, by statute, CPB transmits this public link to the White House for its report to Congress. Additionally, comments pertaining to programming are shared with the CPB Board of Directors and relevant public media staff.
Comments regarding programming may also be shared with CPB’s Ombudsman, an independent observer of public broadcasting. Further information on the Ombudsman is available here.
These questions are related to Truman's speech on Truman doctrine.
Answer and Explanation:
1. According to the discourse, we can consider that people create changes when they take a position and make decisions about a certain subject, then allowing actions to be taken based on that position causing efficient results that cause specific changes. We can see this, since Trumam is against the Communist rise in Greece and Turkia, stating that actions must be taken to change the rising state that these countries are experiencing.
2. Trumam's support provides economic and military aid for Turkey and Greece to fight communism on behalf of the USA. The growing communism in these two countries was financed by the USSR, thus establishing an indirect conflict between the USSR and the USA, promoting the extension of that conflict and the creation of the cold war.
3. The people in our society who created change were motivated by social, cultural and economic elements that caused discomfort and injustice to them and the groups they were subjected to, making them resort to their rights and seek change that would exterminate those elements undesirable.
4. with this they brought about improvements for the entire population, bringing better elements that allowed the quality of life and justice to be better distributed to the population around me.
