Answer:
Explanation:
This refers to the story of aspiring sculptures, Giovanni de Nowheresville, and Mario de Wealthton. They had the same start at the same university, however, their lives afterward were very much different.
<u>Mario returned to his coast city which was rich because of the number of merchants</u>. The number of well-off people was large and they could afford to have art pieces in their home, therefore Mario was often hired to create sculptures. First, he made them by the order, and afterward, he would make the name for himself and he would make them as he wanted.
<u>Giovanni, however, returned to his small town that was centered around farming.</u> He had to work at the farm to support himself, so he finished sculptures slowly. No one in his environment had money to spend on the art, so Giovanni couldn't earn off it and could never make it as famous artists.
<u>Therefore, we see that the key was the environment and the opportunity each of the artists had - Mario became successful because he lived in a rich environment that could support him, and he had the change to live off from art, while Giovanni had to farm for a living and his environment did not have money for the art pieces. </u>
<u></u>
Answer:
B.) Gulf of Mexico
Explanation:
Roger has lived in the Southeast his entire life. He owns a small boat and loves to fish in the warm waters of the gulf. Roger believes that fishing close to the estuaries is one of the best ways to catch a variety of fish. [ Roger is fishing in the Gulf of Mexico. ]
Answer:
brainllest pls?
I listen to kpop because it is awesome
Explanation:
Answer:
A. State laws can ensure fair access for voters to registration and polling places
Explanation:
It is Option A. because when State laws ensure fair access for voters to registration and polling places, every eligible voters or electorates will be given adequate chance and opportunity to vote whoever they believe will represent their interest without biases to another candidate or party. Hence, the right answer is Option A.
It is not option B, because when State laws prohibit political speech if it is considered controversial, that equates to suppression of FREEDOM OF SPEECH, which will eventually results to campaigns being restricted. Thus, this action by the State will not support a fair election process.
It is not Option C. because when State laws restrict voting if the government has a good reason, then some electorates will be disenfranchised, and the election result, will not show the true reflection of the people's will. Thus, this action by the state will not support a fair election process.
It is not Option D. because when State laws benefit some people and hurt others to keep an election fair, those the laws hurt, will be disenfranchised, and that will show biases from the government towards a particular candidate or party over others. Thus, this action by the state will not support a fair election process.
