1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
abruzzese [7]
3 years ago
14

Which statement best describes how machine guns were used during world war 1?

History
2 answers:
AlexFokin [52]3 years ago
8 0
To defend territory would be the correct answer.
adell [148]3 years ago
4 0

Answer choices are :


A. to attack tanks

B. to defend against mustard gas

C. to attack aircraft  

D. to defend territory


Correct answer choice is :


<h2>D) To defend territory</h2><h2 /><h3>Explanation:</h3><h3 />

Machine guns could shoot hundreds of shots of ammo a minute and the standard military tactic of World War One was the army charge. Casualties were enormous. Many soldiers hardly got out of their trench before they were marked down. During that war, they forced a move to trench battle. In later wars, they supported change armies' tactics, moving the armies away from massed formations and into unsecured battle orders.


You might be interested in
All of the following are provisions of the Preamble except
scZoUnD [109]

Answer:

The Preamble is part of the Deceleration of Independence, and I'm pretty sure that preserving the articles of confederation wasn't part of the preamble.

Explanation:

7 0
1 year ago
Read this quote carefully, and think about its main message.
SCORPION-xisa [38]

Answer:

The North started the war to stop slavery, and the South fought to keep slavery.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
world history during world war 1 america became concerned forthe safety of its ships, the concern started because germany announ
Alika [10]

Answer:

Start a new production line of stronger and more agile ships known as the Dreadnought

5 0
3 years ago
Is perpendicular to line segment . If the length of is a units, then the length of is units.
Helga [31]
I’m not sure anymore
4 0
3 years ago
What is Virginia had not seceded from the Union? Would this have affected the war? Why or Why not?
Ne4ueva [31]
Yes it would have because if Virginia had rejected secession, the prospect of Lee in command of Union forces rather than Confederate forces would have presented major problems for the Confederacy. The South would have lost a major economic and political asset, the state of West Virginia would never have been created, the war would almost certainly have been shorter. Interestingly, such circumstances might cast some doubts on how determined the North would have been to end slavery permanently.
Hope this helped!!
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • McIntosh was part ___ and part ___. Scottish; Creek English; Cherokee Scottish; Cherokee
    9·2 answers
  • How engaging with women’s studies will help you to find a more accurate history
    5·1 answer
  • How did the people of Yoruba pick their leaders?
    9·1 answer
  • Submit a paragraph about the Declaration of Independence <br><br> PLEASE HELP ME!!!
    5·2 answers
  • What does Barack Obama believe to be a profound issue regarding his receipt of the Nobel Peace Prize at that time?
    12·2 answers
  • George Washington once went over 13 years without wining a battle.<br> True<br> Or False
    6·2 answers
  • What are some current demographic trends in the United States? Check all that apply.
    13·1 answer
  • Identify and explain one way the industrial revolution changed the world? (Answer cite and explain format )
    12·1 answer
  • List three reasons why the North was a better place for African Americans to live? i need all 3 answers
    7·1 answer
  • What was true of the Open Door policy toward China in 18997
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!