I just think: would I read this in a book? I don't know exactly what you mean but I just set a scene and think; would this make sense?
The correct answer is "object complement", because it follows a direct object (in this case "the normally flat land") and renames it or states what it has become. It cannot be "predicative nominative" because "hilly" is not a noun, "direct object" here is "the normally flat land", and a predicate adjective follows a linking verb (for example, She is PRETTY.) So the only option left is "object complement".
Many things can be made in the field and laboratory, but I think that the safest answer is "observation" - observation is what is usually done in the field, where one does not have the possibility for experiments, or only rarely so. In the lab, one usually performs experiments, but observations are also common, so observation is what connects the two.
Woolf spoke this statement, as he believes that consciences get in the way of creativity and the writing process.
<h3>Why does Woolf believe this?</h3>
- To Woolf, unconsciousness is essential for writing.
- This is because she believes that conscience causes the reality, that the writer lives, to interfere in his/her texts.
- Thus, unconsciousness allows the writer to have great creativity, without letting anything interfere in his creation process, managing to compose efficient and meaningful texts.
With this kind of explanation, the reader can conclude that Woolf is correct since unconsciousness stimulates creativity. However, some texts reflect the real society and discuss relevant issues of reality, therefore, the conscience of its writers is necessary.
More information about Woolf at the link:
brainly.com/question/24781507
