Great plains is your answer looked it up
Answer:
C.
Explanation: It is right.
Answer:
Explanation:
Issue: Can an institution of higher learning use race as a factor when making admissions decisions?
Result: The Court held that universities may use race as part of an admissions process so long as "fixed quotas" are not used. The Court determined that the specific system in place at the University of California Medical School was "unnecessary" to achieve the goal of creating a diverse student body and was merely a "fixed quota" and therefore, was unconstitutional.
Importance: The decision started a line of cases in which the Court upheld affirmative action programs. In 2003, such academic affirmative action programs were again directly challenged in Gratz v. Bollinger and Grutter v. Bollinger. In these cases, the Court clarified that admission programs that include race as a factor can pass constitutional muster so long as the policy is narrowly tailored and does not create an automatic preference based on race. The Court asserted that a system that created an automatic race-based preference would in fact violate the Equal Protection Clause.
Explanation:
There is found a mutation in G5W parents during the gamete formation created X-linked dominant disease allele. As the expression of the allele determines the allele that dominant or recessive. Because sometimes the allele becomes complete even then it is incomplete. In many cases, these alleles occur together or express at the same time that is called co dominance. The X-linked inheritance works differently with male and female because the male has XY chromosome and female has only XX chromosome. So a man has chances their son 50% but daughter has more or 99% chances to be inherited by the disease. Females only pass their X chromosome to each son or daughter so the chances from a female dominant inheritance 50% chances of X-linked disease.
