In a sense yes because it was very affective and powerful, but overall no, it was not very morally acceptable
Answer:
I would say answer B.
Explanation:
The truths that were obvious to the people were that all men were created as equals.
Answer:
Explanation:
The intention of Germany is to conquer France as fast as they could, as well as striking Russia afterwards.
Germans was forced to abandon Schlieffen plan by the compulsion from Russia, this forceful abandonment is as a result of sudden mobilization made by Russia which made the Germans to get out in troops to wage war against Russia at Eastern Front.
I don't think Germany could have won the war if it had stuck with the Schlieffen plan, reasons is that if Germany has failed to get out in troops like they did, gotten through France would have been possible, the bad news there is that Russia would have assaulted them violently unawared.
This is a personal question, which means that only you can answer it. However, I can give some examples that might help guide your work.
An example of a primary source that you might encounter in your own life is that of a news article. As this article is likely to be written by a reporter witnessing the events, it can be considered a primary source. On the other hand, an example of a secondary source would be a non-fiction book that talks about a historical event. This is because such a book would give a second-hand account of an event based on historical information.
