<span>Endowment income is a critical part of the annual
budget of a university and colleges. Based on the given data, the estimated
value of the dollar would be $44.20; this will be the amount of the decline in
the total endowments held by these 10 university. With this, school administrators will be
expected to consider increased in tuition fee and fund raising efforts and implement cost reductions policy.</span>
Previous endowment x 0.77 = Current endowment
<span>Previous endowment = current endowment / 0.77 = $147.9 / 0.77 = $192.10</span>
<span>Reduction = $ 192.10 - $147.90 = $44.20</span>
Answer:
Three part test.
The outcome: if the three requirements are not met, then there is not point the Government should interfere.
At the end, the law will be held.
Explanation:
In some cases, the courts are allowed to protect individual, company or business organization from Government interrupting with these individuals or business organization "fundamental right" and this is the "substantive due process rights " of insurance companies as mentioned in the question above.
The test that the United State Supreme Court can use to determine whether the regulations they want to enact would violate the substantive due process rights of insurance companies is what is known as the THREE PARR TEST.
THE THREE PART TEST has its root from cases such as that of Pasgraf V Long Island Railroad co. The three part test involves three main subjects and they are;
=> foreseeability: are the policies in which insurance companies work going to affect the consumers in the future?
=> proximity: what kind of relationship do the insurance companies have with there consumers?
=> fairness: are these policies just and fair?
CONCLUSION: if the three requirements are not met, then there is not point the Government should interfere.
This is a complicated answer that uses the IS-LM-BP model, but being rather complicated i dont go into fine detail. It is hard to know what is better for an economy. Raising the interest rate lowers consumer purchasing but increases the capital account through investment and vise versa. INcreasing government funding increases money in the economy, thus interest rates increase along side output. But being a new keys myself, i believe that both fiscal and monetry policy can aid in this, but can be seen more easily if only one approach is used first as both measures have different lags.
<span>Exchange rates feed of the following variables </span>
<span>1) the exchange rate of another nation (nominal) and the exchange rate of the host country minus (as below) </span>
<span>2) CPI </span>
<span>3) PPI </span>
<span>These combinations make up an exchange rate figure that is used for money trading. The value of exchange rates and thus money is affected by the following: </span>
<span>1)demand for the currency </span>
<span>2) inflationary rates of a host exchange rate vs other exchange rates </span>
<span>3) future pricings (co-intergration linked with the futures commidity market) </span>
<span>I hope this helps</span>
Answer:
This means that Nepal, as a very underdeveloped country, lacks the necessary amount of domestic capital to build a healthy and functional economy, and for this reason, it requires international help in the form of foreign direct investment that can supply more capital to the country, capital that is used to set up new companies and investment projects that employ more Nepalese people.
A personal leadership reflection is an exercise where you think and write about the way you personally lead. Think about the elements of leadership like management style, communication preferences, self awareness, company vision, team building ability, etc and write about how you practice or view each element.