Athens is widely known as the first democratic society; in other words, Athens was the first city-state in which the government was run by the power of the people. To be specific, it was a direct democracy: the people had a direct say in the actions of the government, with votes held for almost every decision. This influenced the framers of the U.S. constitution because one of the most basic aspects of the United States' creation was to create a free republic; a government in which everyone was free, and everyone had a say in the government (however, the U.S. is a representative, not a direct, democracy; people vote on representatives to vote on decisions)
Answer: Moreover, with this outcome Henry V strengthened his position in his own kingdom; it legitimized his claim to the crown, which had been under threat after his accession. Most importantly, the battle was a significant military blow to France and paved the way for further English conquests and successes.
Explanation:
Hope it helps
Answer:
It provided a way to check the powers of congress and president. Before this ruling, there was no checks and balances.
Explanation:
The 1803 Supreme court case of Marbury v. Madison was an important decision that helped shape the way the powers of the state, as well as the federal government, are dealt with. This event established the case for a judicial review, thereby bringing it for the very first time in the history of the US Supreme Court.
With the case involving the powers of the outgoing and incoming presidents, and the validity of the state and federal powers, the decision laid the groundwork for how the powers of the Congress and the president are limited to. This brings forth the legality of the federal courts to declare any legislation unconstitutional, bringing the step to check exercise of powers. Before this, there had never been checks or balances for the powers of the federal sector.
Answer:
The answer is option (B) Foot-in-the-door phenomenon
Explanation:
Foot-in-the-door phenomenon is a technique of getting someone to grant or comply with a large request by initially making small or modest requests.
The technique is based on the logic that if a respondent (the person being asked) can grant an initial small or modest request, then the respondent would be most likely to later grant a larger request that he/she (the respondent) would not have granted if asked outright (without being approached with small requests first).
