Maybe not get rid of, but it would definitely be a good idea to put aside old textbooks and things like that.
That kind of fallacy is called Argumentum ad Hominem. It means the argument is addressed to the person; attacking that person instead the issue. There is an irrelevance because the argument is against to the person making a claim, rather against to the claim itself. An example is judging a person's social status or attitude, like calling his strategies aren't effective to finish a certain task because of his untidiness and laziness.
Proverbial The Polytheism
Written by IMAGO (Viwe Lugongolo)
<span>It's jungle out there:
howls and roars
Love is in the air,
now is the time to soar.
My self-slavery is of my free will,
When it comes to the heart-
it's either steal or be still.
I won't let you,
out off my sight,
The window begins to cry-
feeling ostracized.
</span>
<span><span>Please take the
time to rate, pick the Brainliest answer (not necessarily mine!), and thank me if you feel I
helped with this question! Thank you, it helps me a lot. :)</span>
</span>
Over 1000 because think of population but lesser
I think you forgot to include options but the correct answer to this question is the Third Amendment. This amendment deals with property rights. Thank you for posting your question. I hope this answer helped you. Let me know if you need more help.