A good conclusion in a research paper restates the hypothesis so that reader can see the value of argument which either defends or criticizes the hypothesis. If it's a long paper it's a good idea to restate the hypothesis in the conclusion. This reminds the user of the hypothesis and draws the paper together. It also revisits the hypothesis and can provide new insight into the hypothesis. Another reason for restating the hypothesis in the conclusion is to pose questions and open the door for future research.
The answer is D. Because planting nonnative species is bad for the area because the plants that normally grow there have to compete with that new species then.
The answer is D as there are fluctuations which means that changes in the population of one affects the population of the other. as prey pop increases predator pop increases leading to a decease in prey pop which causes predator pop to decrease due to lack of food then prey increases and the cycle repeats
Answer:
Multicellular
Explanation:
Unicellular, as the prefix "uni" implies, only have ONE cell. Unicellular organisms can include bacteria, yeast, protists, etc. Multicellular organisms have many cells and are any plant or animal, as they are much larger and complex than unicellular organisms.
As for the second question, the frilled lizard is a perfect example of the ways that organs work together to form necessary organ systems. In the instance of the heart, there are cardiac muscle cells that branch and connect to each other to form cardiac muscle tissue, which has special junctions that cause the cells to contract together and in turn keep the heart pumping and the circulatory system moving.
Does this make sense? Feel free to comment any other questions!! If this explanation helped you, please consider leaving me a good review and/or brainliest!! <3
