Answer:
c. $524,000 and $250,000
Explanation:
See the attached picture for detailed explanation.
The performance management approach that uses job performance evaluations to identify a company's best, average, and worst performing employees, using person-to-person comparisons, is known as "forced ranking".
<h3>What is forced ranking?</h3>
The contentious practice of "forced ranking," which grades employees against one another rather than against performance standards, is very popular in corporate America.
The problem with forced ranking are-
- This can lead to a lack of motivation and disengagement among employees as well as unneeded internal competition that can harm collaboration, creativity, and innovation and divert attention from market competition.
- Although contentious, forced ranking systems are legal. Employers who choose to take action based on those rankings, however, run a number of legal dangers.
The forced rankings beneficial from an employee perspective, here are reasons-
- This system teaches a manager how to assess employees objectively with the right management training.
- When the management system needs to be improved or formalised, forced rankings are advantageous.
- An essential component of business is analysing trends and developments.
To know more about example of forced ranking, here
brainly.com/question/6626507
#SPJ4
Answer:
False
Explanation:
In a business report, the conclusions section explains what all the collected information means and summarizes the most important parts of the report.
While the recommendations section actually presents a list of suggestions and/or specific actions that should be taken.
A firm that is threatened by the potential entry of competitors into a market builds excess production capacity. this is an example of <u>a credible threat.</u>
<u></u>
A credible threat is one in which there is a real possibility that the member may soon do serious physical harm to other people (including death), and that possibility cannot be completely eliminated by changing any existing rules, norms, or practices.
A system holding State data or a product delivered by the Consultant that has an exploit that a person with knowledge of information technology security believes may be used to compromise one or more parts of the system constitutes a credible danger.
To learn more about Credible Threat here
brainly.com/question/20226868
#SPJ4
Answer:
$785.34
Explanation:
The computation of the seller's share of the tax bill is shown below:
= Expected estate taxes for the year × number of days of the tax year ÷ total number of days in a year
= $31,50 × 91 days ÷ 365 days
= $785.34
We simply applied the proportionate method so that the approximate value could be arrived by taking all the information which is mentioned in the question.
