H(t) = −16t^2 + 75t + 25
g(t) = 5 + 5.2t
A)
At 2, h(t) = 111, g(t) = 15.4
At 3, h(t) = 106, g(t) = 20.6
At 4, h(t) = 69, g(t) = 25.8
At 5, h(t) = 0, g(t) = 31
The heights of both functions would have been the closest value to each other after 4 seconds, but before 5 seconds. This is when g(x) is near 30 (26-31), and the only interval that h(t) could be near 30 is between 4 and 5 seconds (as it is decreasing from 69-0).
B) The solution to the two functions is between 4 and 5 seconds, as that is when their height is the same for both g(t) and h(t). Actually the height is at 4.63 seconds, their heights are both
What this actually means is that this time and height is when the balls could collide; or they would have hit each other, given the same 3-dimensional (z-axis) coordinate in reality.
Answer:
(2, - 9 )
Step-by-step explanation:
Since 2 is the output when - 9 is input to f(x)
Then reversing the procedure, that is the inverse gives an output of - 9 for an input of 2.
(- 9, 2) is a point on the graph of f(x), then
(2, - 9) is a point on the graph o the inverse function
(x)
The lowest terms for 19/31 would be 1
Answer:
Molly's estimation was approximately correct.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given:
Diameter of bike tire = 2 feet
Also Given:
She estimated that for every turn of the tire, the bike traveled about 6 feet.
Estimated Distance traveled = 6 feet
We need to find that whether her estimation reasonable.
Solution:
Now we know that Distance traveled is equal to Circumference of tire.
Since Tire is in circular shape.
We can say that;
Circumference of the tire will be π times diameter.
framing in equation form we get;
Circumference of the tire = 
Now The actual distance traveled is 6.28 feet and Molly estimated as 6 feet.
Hence we can say that Molly's estimation was approximately correct.
A rotation rotates the pre image an x amount of degrees
a translation shifts a pre image up and down or left and right
a reflection reflects an image across an x or
y axis
a dilation stretches or compresses(shrinks) a pre image