Personally I’d say the answer is A because if one person is the only one putting input, others ideas & opinions will not be heard.
Answer:
You could compare a handsome gentleman to a book because they both hold the characteristics of being:
- Mysterious- you cannot judge books nor man by their cover. Underneath their "cover" they can be an array of things. Perhaps you wanted a Dystopian novel but you got some humor along with it. Perhaps you wanted a man with confidence, but you got charisma instead with a soft interior. They are similar.
- Well Mannered- Books are cultured, they hold knowledge and present information from an intreresting perspective. So do gentlemen, they are cultured and hold information.
- Effective at Communicating- Books are known for their words. They are able to communicate their message. So can men, if you are a gentleman you are supposed to be good with words- silver-tongued some may say.
Anyway, I hope that helped even though it wasn't put together well. Have a good day!
Her style was characterized by usage of hyphens and weird sentencing so here is my attempt.
Explanation:
Once or twice it happened --
but all the while - i left the blame
to let the blame scorch the sky
and never, ever ----- reach
reach for me, because ---- no one could.
Attempting futility --- again
I rise, I fall, yes-- indeed again
Reach for me, because it seems
It's not possible
To reach, no one could.
<u>This poem attempts at her disjointed punctuation along with the free verse stanzas with augmented flows that seem to be found often in her poetry</u>. Hope this helps.
