Answer:
a part of a larger group of related things.
hope it helps:)
The answer is <u>"irresistible impulse rule".</u>
In criminal law, irresistible impulse is a resistance by pardon, for this situation some kind of craziness, in which the litigant contends that they ought not be held criminally at risk for their activities that overstepped the law, since they couldn't control those activities, regardless of whether they knew them to be wrong. It was added to the M'Naghten govern as a reason for vindication in the mid twentieth century.
"Irresistible impulse" can be argued just under the protection of reduced duty, not under the resistance of craziness. In this way it works just as a halfway guard to murder, diminishing the charge to homicide, and giving the judge carefulness as to length of sentence and whether committal would be more proper than detainment.
Answer:
D.
Explanation:
I think because I believe conversions usually have to deal with beliefs/religious things. Forcing that persons opinion to be different.
Sorry if that's incorrect.
Answer:
I did this before it is c
Explanation:
i did this before so I know it is right I had a 100
Answer: routine activity theory
Explanation:
According to this theory all of these three factors must combine in order for a crime to be considered.
This theory has been criticized because it makes assumption that a person planning to commit a crime will follow a rational thinking in making such a decision .
In most cases people who commit criminal activities are usually under the influence of drugs which affect their ability to think rationally and chances are they may not even be aware of any crime prevention techniques for them to be thinking step by step .
Criminals usually act on the hit of the moment with no rational thinking.