Answer: B. It is shifting from a planned to a free-market economy.
Explanation:
Answer:
A larger industrial and service sector, and a larger number of people working outside of agriculture, can indicate a higher level of industrialization in the economy and vice versa. This means that the size of industrial service and the sector of agriculture employment rate indicates the level of industrialization because if the agriculture employment is higher than the industrial service it means that the country is not fully developed yet and therefore the level of industrialization is lower. But if the industrial service is higher than the agriculture employment that suggests or indicates that the country is developing or developed. For example in the United States the size of the industrial/service sector is much larger than it's agricultural employment and therefore this should suggest that country is much more industrialized or developed and the United States is. In comparison you take a developing country such as Chad and you can see that the agricultural employment is higher than the size of the industrial/service sector and in relation to this you can see that Chad must have a lower level of industrialization and in fact it does.
Explanation:
Answer:
The ROA (Return on Assets) and the Return on Sales are the ratios which use the de-levered net income.
Explanation:
The shareholders want to evaluate or measure the return without any effects of the interest expense. De- levered net income is required to alter the net income so that it can be added back it to the interest expense.
The ratio which using De-levered net income are the ROA that is Return on assets and the Return on Sales because it is used to measure the return.
Answer: $120,000
Explanation:
The cost, that would be allocated in the first-stage allocation to the Fabricating activity cost pool will be:
Wages and salaries = 10% × $420,000 = $42000
Depreciation = 5% × $240000 = $12000
Occupancy = 30% × $220,000 = $66,000
Therefore, the fabricating cost will be:
= $42000 + $12000 + $66000
= $120,000
One thing that is not required for adverse possession is confrontation with the owner.
<h3>What is adverse possession?</h3>
Adverse possession refers to the way a person staying on a piece of land, can get the title to that piece of land from the owner by law. But they will need to meet certain requirements for them to be able to do so.
Some of these requirements include:
- a claim of right or color of title
- open and notorious use
- hostile to the true owner's title
- pay taxes
This means that for one to perform an adverse possession, there is no need for a confrontation with the owner of the land. One can simply get this done with the Courts.
Find out more on adverse possession at brainly.com/question/28167922
#SPJ1
