1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sleet_krkn [62]
4 years ago
9

Settlers in the backcountry created new distinctive cultures, fueling social and ethnic tensions and often resulting in violent

protest to express grievances."
For TWO of the following, analyze the causes and effects of the revolt: *Bacon's Rebellion *Shay's Rebellion *Whiskey Rebellion

Explain which ONE event best reflects the statement above.

Explain why your choice is better than ONE of the other choices listed.
PLEASE HELP!!!
History
1 answer:
V125BC [204]4 years ago
7 0

Answer:

lol i hope you don't copy this word for word

Explanation:

A. Bacon's Rebellion was caused by dissatisfaction among the colonists from high taxes, low prices for tobacco, and anger towards Sir Berkeley because he provided special privileges that were given to those close to the Berkeley. In addition, Berkeley told the Indians that colonists would not expand further into the west, which greatly angered the colonists because they wanted more land. The biggest effect of this revolt was that people began to turn away from indentured servants and the slave trade grew. This was because the ruling class was surprised and worried that black servants and white colonists had banded together against them, leading them to be more harsh on black slaves.

Shay's Rebellion was caused by a rise in taxes and because a debt crisis was about to lead many colonists to be imprisoned. The rebellion occurred in protest of these taxes and to prevent the imprisonment of the colonists. As a result of the violence, people called for the Constitutional Convention because the rebellion exposed governmental weakness (especially flaws in the Articles of Confederation) and needed a way to prevent future rebellions. 

B. Bacon's Rebellion best reflects the statement above. As people began to settle and create distinctive cultures in the Virginia colonies, social and ethnic tensions fueled between them and the Native Indians as the colonists kept wanting more of their land. These tensions resulted in Bacon's Rebellion, which was a violent protest to express grievances to their governor. Their governor promised the natives that the colonists would not expand any further, a decision that infuriated the Virginia colonists because that was against their desire. They wanted to keep expanding and taking more Indian land.

C. Bacon's Rebellion is a better choice than the Whiskey Rebellion because Bacon's Rebellion deals with ethnic tensions much more than the Whiskey Rebellion. Both of these had many similarities, such as that backcountry settlers violently revolted to protest something that the ruling class did. However, a main difference is that Bacon's Rebellion protested against Native Americans, a group of people whose social and ethnic cultures were extremely different from the colonists. In contrast, the Whiskey Rebellion was a protest about the government, and both the colonists and the politicians were white American citizens, therefore meaning that these two groups of people did not have social/ethnic cultures that were as contrasting.

You might be interested in
Leader(s) and one political party.
Daniel [21]

Answer:

One

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
How did railroad expansion affect the growth of major urban centers?
Greeley [361]

Answer:

Traveling to and from cities became faster

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why are secondary sources often useful
Anarel [89]
Secondary Sources are useful because they offer a different point of view to past events. While most secondary sources are based on a primary source, they are still useful because of the analysis that they can offer compared to past stories.
3 0
4 years ago
Who was the totalitarian leader in Spain that looked to Hitler and Mussolini for help gaining power?
Vanyuwa [196]

Answer: Francisco Franco

Explanation:

Francisco Franco was governing over Spain during WWII, and worked with Hitler (dictator of Germany) and Mussolini (dictator of Italy) in order to gain power and fight the war.

3 0
3 years ago
5. Which statement is true of both plebeians and slaves? (5.03)
NeTakaya

Answer:

I think question is not complete

Explanation:

7 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Over the years, the Supreme Court has shifted to permit _____
    11·2 answers
  • Why did the British think that cutting off the New England Colonies From the Middle Colonies would help them defeat the Patriots
    11·1 answer
  • How did the initially small slide in stock prices lead to the stock market crash?
    14·1 answer
  • In what ways today does the government limit freedom of press guaranteed by the first amendment
    7·1 answer
  • Who were the whisky boys
    12·1 answer
  • After the colonists won independence from Britain, what was their main concern?
    7·1 answer
  • Why do you think the union lost the first battle of bull run?
    13·1 answer
  • In Miranda v. Arizona (1966), why did Ernesto Miranda say his Fifth Amendment rights had been violated?
    6·2 answers
  • Question is in the photo pls answer ASAP
    5·2 answers
  • During the Vietnam War, US troops had the advantage of
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!