I believe the answer is: <span>the allocation method
production possibilities graph could only include the factors that can be projected after doing combination of various products' production.
Allocation method only play role in the technique that can be used to produce the products and cannot be considered as data projection from the production
</span>
Since Intel has a history of effectively transforming
R&D investment into income, the pro-forma version of the ration seems to be
of more significant. A company starting, for instance, would be unalike: its
track record would be much poorer and probabilities are that the criteria set
in place would not be as rough as Intel’s. Therefore, it appears that the significance
hinge on the kind of business: if future benefit is more of a doubt, then
R&D should be expensed. The contradictory is true if benefit is almost certain.
Intel also has the advantage of being very vibrant with its R&D objectives
and having exact, measurable standards. They note obviously what the funds are apportioned
to and what the end outcomes should be of the growth.
Might have to do some personal research idk who's gonna do a whole project for you but googles a wonderful thing
Answer:
which language is this? or is it just nonsense?
