Answer:
The author Mike brown's purpose is to bring to our attention the recent dilemma about the decision to declare or remove the planet Pluto as a valid planet. He believes that Pluto remains a planet and others are also declared as planets so that children and future generations will have the idea of explorations as an ongoing process.
His main argument was that if Pluto and 2003 UB313 are declared as full-fledged planets, then that will encourage children to believe in the possibility of future explorations and that they can also be a part of such adventures.
Explanation:
Mike Brown's article "War of the Worlds" is an argumentative text on why space unions must accept the fact that Pluto and the newly discovered 2003 UB313. This is because if such discoveries are deemed invalid and not accepted, then there is no use for further explorations. Moreover, scientific studies have also already taken a backseat, which is detrimental to future generations who have an interest in the field.
But if such explorations are accepted, then the interest will remain and also give new birth to space studies. Moreover, it will also ensure that future exploration activities are done.
And in advancing his argument, Brown recounts his childhood fascination with space and how such a negative approach to accepting new exploration activities might hinder a child from having any interest in the scientific field. But <em>"[d]oing so might convince schoolchildren to put new paper disks on their walls, to look up to the sky and realize that exploration does continue and that they can be part of it, too."</em>
This is an example of the Second Newton´s Law of Motion.
He formulated three laws. The Second Law of Motion establishes the relation between force, acceleration and therefore velocity.
It states that "The force acting on an object is equal to the mass of that object times its acceleration." This is written in mathematical form as F = <em>m</em>a, where F is force, <em>m</em> is mass, and a is acceleration.
The bold letters indicate that force and acceleration are vector quantities.
On the other hand, the First Law of Motion states that "A body at rest will remain at rest, and a body in motion will remain in motion unless it is acted upon by an external force".
Finally, the Third Law of Motion states that "For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction".
The sentence that best explains the effect of the metaphor '<span>But a bird that stalks down his narrow cage can seldom see through his bars of rage' would be letter d. The metaphor explains that the bird that is trapped may be consumed by its own anger.</span>
The answer is A.
Hope that helped....
