Answer:
Yes.
Alexander is an intended third party beneficiary of the contract between Michael and Jackson Auto Sales.
Explanation:
In the law of contracts, Alexander becomes a third-party beneficiary of the contract between Michael and Jackson Auto Sales, and he has the right to sue in the contract notwithstanding that he was not an active party to the contract. Some of the factors that may be present to show that a Alexander is an intended beneficiary are: (1) the contract's performance is rendered directly to Alexander; (2) Alexander has rights to control the details of the performance; or (3) there is an express designation in the contract, e.g. the title to the car is in Alexander's name.
The total product cost per unit under absorption costing is: $75.
In absorption costing, the cost of every unit produced is worked out by adding up the direct cost of materials, direct labor, variable overhead, and the fixed overhead. Unlike in the case of marginal costing where the fixed cost is treated as period cost, in absorption costing, fixed cost is treated as a product cost.
The cost per unit
$
Direct material 28
Direct labor 24
Variable overhead 10
Fixed cost 13
Cost per unit 75
Cost of Inventory
Number of units = 1000
Cost per unit = $75
Value = 1000 * $75 = $75,000
Learn more about absorption costing here:brainly.com/question/26276034
#SPJ4
Answer:
Franchisee
Explanation:
A franchise business is a form of business arrangement where a business owners , who is known as the franchisor , sells the right to operate its business to another entity known as the Franchisee.
This business arrangement is legally binding an it gives right to the use of the business name , logo ,and model to third party retail outlet.
This explains the type of business arrangement that Sana is planning , considering the explanation given in the question.
Answer:D - system analysis
Explanation: The system analysis stage in the System Development Life Cycle is on of the most important step. Here the security of the system is analysed to test if it will perform the function accurately without security bridge.
At this state, the security activity of the system is tested.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "B": property rights must be clearly assigned to the parties involved in the dispute.
Explanation:
Named after British lawyer and economist Ronald Coase (<em>1910-2013</em>) the Coase Theorem states when there are competitive markets and no transaction costs bargaining will lead to an efficient and mutually beneficial outcome. The theorem affirms that when property rights are defined and divided, parties will gravitate to the most efficient and beneficial outcome.
