Bruh what is you talking bout I ain’t never seen to pretty best
Answer:
Option B (Wheel) is the right answer.
Explanation:
- That was the most suited wheel-based networking architecture. So every team works reasonably amongst the many departments together, communicated as well as worked together as a centralized control through hubs.
- Instead, every crew here works alone and is interconnected to the hub so that it wouldn't immediately impact the activities of some other groups.
The other four alternatives aren't connected to the given scenario. So the above is the right option.
Answer:
Explanation:
journal entries in the books of AXE
jan 6 purchased goods from Green worth $1200 term 2/10 , n/30
Inventory a/c $1200
Accounts Payable - green $1200
jan 6 purchased goods from munoz worth $900
inventory a/c$900
Accounts Payable - munoz $900
jan 14 Payment being made to green. Since payment is made within 8 days so discount will be recieved by Axe( note term 2/10 means if payment is made within 10 days axe will recieve discount @2%)
Accounts payable - green $1200
Cash $1,176
discount recieved $ 24
( being discount recieved [email protected]% = $24)
Feb 2 payment made to munoz , since it is paid after 10 days no discount will be recieved
Accounts payable- munoz $900
Cash $900
feb 28 purchased goods worth $350 from reynold
Inventory $350
Accounts payable - reynold $350
Answer:
B
Explanation:
When we talk of a decreasing cost industry, we refer to an industry in which the expansion of the industry will lead to a decrease in the unit production cost.
So with respect to the question at hand , the correct answer is that the input prices will fall as industry expands
The case of a a technological improvement is expected to drive a decrease in the input prices for production in the expanding industry
At the point when both cohesiveness and performance norms are high, productivity will be high.
<u>Explanation</u>:
It is genuine with respect to the impact of gathering cohesiveness and execution standards on bunch profitability.
Gathering cohesiveness is one of the trademark highlights of the gatherings, which is significant from the behaviouristic perspective. Cohesiveness is how much the gathering individuals are pulled in to one another and are persuaded to remain in the gatherings. Cohesiveness characterizes the level of closeness that the individuals feel with the gatherings. It is comprehended as the degree of preferring every part has towards others in the gathering and how far everybody needs to stay as an individual from the gathering.
"Cohesiveness alludes to the degree of solidarity 'in the gathering and is reflected in individuals' adjustment to the standards of the gathering, the sentiment of fascination for one another and needing to be co-individuals from the gathering." Attraction, cohesiveness, and similarity are altogether interwoven. The more the individuals feel pulled in to the gathering, the more noteworthy will be the gathering cohesiveness. The more noteworthy the cohesiveness, the more prominent the impact of the gathering individuals to convince each other to adjust to the gathering standards. The more prominent the congruity, the more noteworthy the character of the individuals to the gathering and the more noteworthy the gathering cohesiveness.