Answer:
$53,600
Explanation:
The computation of the cash flow from investing activities is shown below:
Cash flow from investing activities
Sale value of machinery $53,600
Net cash flow from investing activities $53,600
The current year depreciation expense is to be reported under operating activities and as we know that the investing activities record those activities which are held for purchased and sale of long term assets so the sale value fo machinery is only reported
Answer:
37.9 days
Explanation:
Given that,
Net sales = $951,000
Beginning accounts receivables = $75,500
Ending accounts receivables = $122,000
Average accounts receivables:
= (Beginning accounts receivables + Ending accounts receivables) ÷ 2
= ($75,500 + $122,000) ÷ 2
= $98,750
Accounts Receivable Turnover:
= Net sales ÷ Average accounts receivables
= $951,000 ÷ $98,750
= 9.63
Average collection period:
= 365 days ÷ Accounts Receivable Turnover
= 365 days ÷ 9.63
= 37.9 days
Organization Expenses Dr 7,500
Cash 7,500
June 14 Cash Dr 120,000
Common Stock 110,000
Paid-In Capital in Excess of par value—Common 10,000
June 22 Cash Dr 120,000
Preferred Stock 90,000
Paid-In Capital in Excess of par value—Preferred 30,000
Answer:
Alternative A should be accepted as it is giving favourable result of $30,600
Explanation:
Xinhong Company
ALTERNATIVE A: INCREASE OR (DECREASE) IN NET INCOME
Cost to buy new machine $123,000
Cash received to trade in old machine $48,000
Reduction in variable manufacturing costs = 4*($33500 - $22400) = $44,400
Total change in net income $30,600
ALTERNATIVE B: INCREASE OR (DECREASE) IN NET INCOME
Cost to buy new machine $119,000
Cash received to trade in old machine $48,000
Reduction in variable manufacturing costs = 4*($33500 - $10300) = $92,800
Total change in net income $21,800
Therefore, Alternative A should be accepted as it is giving favourable result of $30,600
I wholeheartedly agree and think it’s practically self-evident.
Here’s an excellent example from history.
For 28 years, the Berlin Wall separated East Berlin from West Berlin and was the most heavily militarized border crossing in the Western hemisphere. In 1989, during a press conference with western media, Gunther Schabowski was handed a note explaining a change in policy governing border crossing. Several discussions took place about making a show of opening the border between East and West Germany, but nobody informed Schabowski.
At the end of the press conference, he appears to have remembered the note belatedly, and read it verbatim—which was not what was intended. When asked about when the border would open, he assumed it was immediate.
The reality of course was that East Germany had no intention of opening the border, and certainly not immediately.
Within hours, the border crossing was practically buried under thousands of East Germans eager to be reunited with their families and other loved ones after 28 years on the press conference, which had been broadcast live.
The East Germans believed what they were told: Schabowski said immediately, and they intended to go immediately.
Border guards kept calling for instructions, until finally, they relented.
Perception became reality, and the border between East and West Berlin opened, spelling the de facto end of the separation of Germany.
273 viewsView 2 Upvoters · Answer requested by Never Wong
Related Questions (More Answers Below)
