Answer:
The politics of the period inevitably drove France towards war with Austria and its allies. The King, many of the Feuillants, and the Girondins specifically wanted to wage war.
- The King was hoping war would increase his personal popularity and make him stronger.
- The Girondins wanted to export the Revolution throughout Europe and, by extension, to defend the Revolution within France.
- Other Monarchs from Prussia, Austria were threatening of invading France on the behalf of the French Monarchy. Moreover, the king was unhappy to sharing power and not wanting to accept the limitation on his power as result he agitating with the foreign monarchs
- People like Barnave and Robespierre in France opposed the war, and in Austria the emperor Leopold II, brother of Marie Antoinette, may have wished to avoid war, but unfortunately he died on 1 March 1792.
Thus France under this circumstance it preemptively declared war on Austria (20 April 1792). Prussia joined the Austrian side a few weeks later. And the wars that will catapult Napoleon into notoriety was on.
The Sumerians in Mesopotamia near the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers being among the first civilized well-developed agricultural nations in the world, learned from the Ubaidians. The latter people were a strong creative force at one time who gave rise to such things as weaving, masonry and pottery which could explain the origins of artifacts like the one shown above here.
I would think
<span>C. By the amount of people who moved to the south during reconstruction
</span>
The three major rivers of india are orginated in himalaya mountains
The answer would be “that ‘separate but equal’ was a valid legal doctrine”. This is because this ruling upheld the constitutionality of segregation under the premise that as long as things were “equal” for African Americans then they could be separate.
