Answer:
B. folk
Explanation:
<u>Joshua Johnson was the painter of the style called naive or folk art.</u>
<u>This means he had no formal training but was self-taught and that their art usually lacks formal components (perspective, composition, anatomy, etc.) and focuses more on simplicity and frankness.</u>
The meaning of folk art in this sense means it comes from normal, everyday people, usually in the village environment.
<u>There is not much known about Johnson, but it has been discovered that he had no previous education when it comes to art. As he was a mixed-race man of white father and black, slave mother, he certainly had no chance to pursue the education he needed. All of his paintings have a certain simplicity, stiff faces, and objects that keep repeating themselves. </u>
Today, his work is part of museum collections.
Answer:
overproduction of goods and the expansion of unbridled credit by banks.
Explanation:
The Great Depression of the 1930s was the largest recession in history and its causes were overproduction of goods and the expansion of unbridled credit by banks.
The American economy was experiencing a period of euphoria during the 1920s. The US had become the world's leading economic powerhouse and was the largest supplier of manufactures to Europe. In this scenario, banks have expanded their credit rampantly to sustain the increase in production. However, production increased in a way that there was not enough consumer market to dispose of the products. The businessmen lost the conditions to pay their loans to the banks and the financial system collapsed.
Currently, the Federal Reserve has regulatory mechanisms that aim to reduce the risk of unbridled expansion of bank credit, such as the collection of the compulsory deposit and monetary policy. However, it is not possible to say that the risk is non-existent. We live in a special moment where technology has positive impacts, but can also cause negative havoc. For example, virtual currencies, if not well regulated, can cause a new crisis.
Answer:
The system of extraction was a system in which the colonizer, or the ruling country, extracted resources from the colony. This, often, over decades of imperial rule, resulted in the colony being stripped of its resources. When they were decolonized, the loss of these precious resources often led to economic depression and unrest. Many examples of this can be seen in Africa, where European rulers ran the colonies as their own property, plundering the natural wealth such as diamonds, ivory, timber and bauxite.
Explanation:
