1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Elis [28]
2 years ago
13

What modern phenomenon does yellow journalism remind you of?

History
1 answer:
DedPeter [7]2 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Sensationalism

Explanation:

Yellow journalism is described as the use of sensational or shocking headlines to capture a reader's attention and is considered unethical.

The modern phenomena that yellow journalism reminds me of is sensationalism which is the use of obscene, false and misleading stories to create fear among people.

You might be interested in
approximately what precent of the white population of the south was in no way connected to slavery? 10% 15% 50% 75%
Anna35 [415]

Answer:

75%

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Plz help me and do all of it this is a LoT of points on both ends
NemiM [27]

Islam began with the Prophet Muhammad. Islam means "surrender" and its central idea is a surrendering to the will of God. Its central article of faith is that "There is no god but God and Muhammad is his messenger".

Followers of Islam are called Muslims. Muslims believe that they are following in the same tradition as the Judeo-Christian figures Adam, Noah, Abraham, Moses, and Jesus who they believe were significant prophets before Muhammad.

Islam spread through military conquest, trade, pilgrimage, and missionaries. Arab Muslim forces conquered vast territories and built imperial structures over time.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The storming of the Bastille occurred
padilas [110]

Answer:

Explanation:

The Storming of the Bastille (French: Prise de la Bastille [pʁiz də la bastij]) occurred in Paris, France, on the afternoon of 14 July 1789. The medieval armory, fortress, and political prison known as the Bastille represented royal authority in the centre of Paris.

Result: Insurgent victory: Bastille captured; Fre...

Date: 14 July 1789; 231 years ago

Location: Paris, Île-de-France, France48°51

7 0
3 years ago
Understanding the Case
S_A_V [24]

Answer:

Marbury: Was appointed as a federal judge - Supported the Judiciary Act of 1789 - Argued for original jurisdiction.

-Madison: Refused to honor an appointment.Explanation:

Marbury v. Madison was a judicial case resolved by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1803. It arose as a result of a political dispute following the presidential elections of 1800, in which Thomas Jefferson, who was a Democratic Republican, defeated then-President John Adams, who was a federalist. In the last days of the outgoing government of Adams, the Congress, dominated by the federalists, established a series of judicial positions, among them 42 justices the of peace for the District of Columbia. The Senate confirmed the appointments, the president signed them and the Secretary of State was in charge of sealing and delivering the appointment documents. In the last-minute hustle and bustle, the outgoing secretary of state did not deliver the minutes of appointment to four justices of the peace, including William Marbury.

The new secretary of state under President Jefferson, James Madison, refused to deliver the minutes of appointment as the new government was irritated by the maneuver of the federalists of trying to secure control of the judiciary with the appointment of members of their party just before ceasing in government. However, Marbury appealed to the Supreme Court to order Madison to deliver his record.

If the Court ruled in favor of Marbury, Madison could still refuse to deliver the record and the Supreme Court would have no way to enforce the order. If the Court ruled against Marbury, it risked submitting the judiciary to Jefferson's supporters by allowing them to deny Marbury the position he could legally claim. Chief Justice John Marshall resolved this dilemma by deciding that the Supreme Court was not empowered to settle this case. Marshall ruled that Section 13 of the Judiciary Act, which granted the Court these powers, was unconstitutional because it extended the original jurisdiction of the Court to the jurisdiction defined by the Constitution itself. Having decided not to intervene in this particular case, the Supreme Court secured its position as final arbiter of the law.

8 0
3 years ago
Helpppppppppppppppppppppppppp
JulijaS [17]
By sending spies to the USSR to copy their plans for sputnik

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is a government? Needs to be 8 sentences
    15·1 answer
  • During the Cold War, the international system was ___ and the great powers were ___.
    5·1 answer
  • What are two affects of the Lewis and Clark Expedition
    13·1 answer
  • What happened after four candidates ran for president in 1860
    12·1 answer
  • Which one of the following is an example of being diversified? Dutch colonists had many different religions. New Amsterdam had m
    11·2 answers
  • What happened in 2500 <br> b.<br> c. in mesopotamian empires?
    9·1 answer
  • The Reconstruction Amendments were passed to:
    12·2 answers
  • Ion 1<br> The military alliance that includes the US and western Europe:
    15·1 answer
  • Should mobs be allowed to influence government action? why or why not?
    9·1 answer
  • During the Great Depression, in what year did Oklahoma’s economy suffer the most with high unemployment and loss of income? A. 1
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!