<span>The net benefits of each public good will be the total cost of the project minus the $300 cost per person. If the project costs 600$ the net benefits for each public good will be $300.
$600(total cost) - $300(cost per person) = $300(net benefits)</span>
So lets say we have two investment opportunities. A new convenient store in your neighborhood or a new shopping center more than 5 miles away from where you live... What would you invest in well lets look at the pros and cons of each investment. So even though the new convenient store is right around the corner from you and prices are low the new shopping center has better products, warranty and higher prices unlike the convenient store closer to you. So we have an investment budget of $1000 dollars and want to spend it wisely we need to access what has a better chance of being successful with what you put into it. So the convenient store will reach less people has a bargain price but also doesn't have security cameras. Even though the shopping center has great employees, top-of-the-line products, high security, and a great establishment but also has flaws. What are you gonna invest in, will you take risks? My personal opinion is that I would invest in the shopping center because more people would be attracted to it because of the quality of service and products. So it would have a better probability in success and good use of my money.
Answer:
to maximize profit, farmer must use 0.208 pounds of fertilizers
Explanation:
For profit maximization, marginal revenue must be equal to marginal cost.
Here marginal product of fertilizer= 1-N/200
selling price per busher= $4
total marginal revenue= (1-N/200)× 4
Total cost of fertilizer= 1.2N
To maximize profit
Marginal cost= marginal revenue
1.2N= (1-N/200)× 4
4.8N= 1-N/200
N= 0.208 pounds
to maximize profit, farmer must use than 0.208 pounds of fertilizers
In a traditional IRA there is either an equal or near to equal contribution made by employer. So, if $3,500 is to be invested let's assume that another $3,500 to be invested by employer with a total contribution (of 3500+3500=7000) the net contribution would be the same as the total contribution, tax rate is not given. Let's assume tax assume tax slab of 28%. Traditional IRS-matching contribution from employer Net contribution-$3,500+3,500=7,000 Roth IRA Assumption-Tax bracket of 28% Net contribution= amount invested minus tax=$3500 minus (28% on 3500)= $3500- $980=$2520 Hence net contribution is not of taxes in case of Roth IRA Once the traditional IRA or Roth IRA is established, you decide to invest the proceeds in a mutual fund. Identify the type of mutual fund you would select.
Answer:
c. she can file a lawsuit against the corporation for damages.
Explanation:
Based on the scenario being described within the question it can be said that the only action that may not be taken would be for Ariana to file a lawsuit against the corporation for damages. This mainly because the corporation is not responsible for any damages that may be incurred since Ariana did not discuss her decisions with the board of directors and was therefore acting alone, making her alone liable for the damages.
