I think it would be B creating a government based on religion cause there extremist they wouldn't liberate Muslim woman. Separate state form religion or promote tolerance but D i think could be also the answer .
When it comes to Muslim extremist organizations, a common motive is certainly not the liberation of Muslim women, because their law is based on the Sharia law, according to which women have a subordinate role in society. The main motive of all of them is the establishment of a religious Muslim state - caliphate. In such a state, Muslim religious leaders would have all authority over the state, there should be a distinction between the caliphates formed in the seventh century, after the emergence of Ilsam and such extremist ideas. Such a country excludes tolerance because we are witnesses of the destruction of a cultural multi-millennial heritage in areas where Muslim extremists were in power. Certainly the state would not be separated from religion because their idea is to control all the spheres of the state and society, a government that would rule all the elements of the state.
States rights reflected in the DOI are making sure the people are safe and happy
In the AOC the states have a lot more freedoms as long as 9 states agree to certain things which affect the
<span>country</span>
