Operant conditioning is the correct answer.
Operant conditioning, also referred to as instrumental conditioning, is a learning method that involves rewarding and punishing behaviors. So, rewarding someone can increase a specific behavior while punishing him/her can decrease this behavior. In this situation, through operant conditioning, the teacher is trying to make Henry see that if he doesn't change his behavior, he will have to face the consequences.
Ramona spent 9/10 of her money because you can simplify 60/100 To 6/10 And just add 3/10 To 6/10 which is 9/10
As learning occurs over repeated conditioning trails, the conditioned stimulus increasingly predicts the unconditioned stimulus, and prediction error <u>declines</u>.
When the outcome of a conditioning trial is different from that which is predicted by the conditioned stimuli that are present on the trial(i.e.., when the US is surprising). prediction error is necessary to create Pavlovian conditioning (and associative learning generally). So conditioning works to correct or reduce prediction error.
To learn something through classical conditioning, there must first be some prediction error, or the chance that a conditioned stimulus won't lead to the expected outcome. with the example of the bell and the light, because the bell always leads to the reward of food, there's is no "prediction error" that the addition of the light helps to correct. However, if the researcher suddenly requires that the bell and the light both occurs in order to receive the food, the bell alone will produce a prediction error that the animal has to learn.
To know more about prediction error please refer
brainly.com/question/14244786
#SPJ4
Answer:
<h3>Option D, Laches.</h3>
Explanation:
Latches is the legal practice that does not allow a legal right or claim to be enforced or allowed if there has been a long delay in asserting the right or claim of that particular case.
This is done because some cases or claims which could've solved years back is being delayed to maximize the consequence of the defendant.
For instance, Bill decides not to file a case against Bart for property line encroachment but waits for few years until Bart builds a new house on that land which has Bill's name on it.