2. What role did slavery play in the debates at the Constitutional Convention?

2 answers:

7 0

They were trying to decide on how many representatives each state should have. There was a conflict between the north and the south debating whether slaves should be counted as people. The south wanted to gain more representatives based on population by using the sleeves as people. Eventually the north and the south came to a resolution that every five slaves would count as one person.

Alla [95]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

The primary purpose of the Constitutional Convention was to forge a political union, not a moral one. Many of the delegates at Philadelphia were hostile to the very notion of slavery. ... A number of delegates from the South concurred. On a moral level, slavery was virtually indefensible despite numerous.

Explanation:

You might be interested in

John Locke believed that al people had natural rights which included

Ivahew [28]

Answer:

D. All of the Above

Explanation:

John Locke believed that all people had natural rights, which included:

Life, Liberty, and Property.

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

How has history of feudalism actually reduced the level of inequality in many modern european nations?

wlad13 [49]

Feudalism helps the reducing of a level of inequality in many European nations because it generates a tradition of state paternalism, which set the time for the modern welfare state. Feudalism rises the perfect monarchies. Feudalism helped to stabilize European society.

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

According to Erasmus, is it biblical to execute heretics?

Alex

Answer: According to Erasmus, it is not biblical to execute heretics.

Explanation: Erasmus was a Christian humanist that lived during the Renaissance period.<u> He promoted religious toleration as he was against the execution of heretics</u>. Instead of being in favour of the killing of heretics, <u>Erasmus believed in conversion, even though he also supported free will</u>. In that way, throughout his work, he aimed at putting an end to the execution of heretics for considering it anti-biblical.

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

If you were alive in the time period, which man’s movement do you think you would have joined? Why? (You must pick MLK or Malcol

hoa [83]

Here is information for both sides

Martin Luther King Jr.

One might want to be part of Martin Luther King Junior's movement because he was an advocate of nonviolence. King felt that violence only caused more problems and would allow for white citizens to continue to perceive African-Americans as hostile and unworth of equal treatment in America. This is why King would go on to organize several peaceful protests including marches, sit-ins, and boycotts. All of these can be seen as effective as they helped to get rid of racist policies and laws within the United States.

Malcolm X

One might want to be part of Malcolm X's movement because he is an advocate for standing up for oneself. Malcolm X refuses to be physically harrassed or hurt by white citizens who are trying to take away his rights. This refusal to back down shows courage and can result in change in the way people view African-American citizens.

5 0

3 years ago

What physical map uses color to indicate elevation and features.

melisa1 [442]

A political map uses color to indicate elevation and features.

3 0

3 years ago