Answer:
When the person clearly states his opinion and provides specific examples - Most likely to persuade.
The person is older than the reader - Somewhat likely to persuade.
When the person shouts, uses lots of exclamation points, or accuses anyone who doesn't agree of being ignorant - Not likely to persuade.
Explanation:
The above are correct. I have been able to match the element of argument with the likelihood that it will persuade a reader.
When opinions are clearly stated and communicated and backed up with specific examples, it is most likely to persuade. The specific examples provided reinforces and solidifies the person's opinion. The older person can persuade if the younger reader knows of the person's expertise and experience.
Using shouting and accusation will not lead to any form of persuasion.
Go check health line for more it’s called 50 foods that are super healthy
Good luck
If I helped pls mark brainliest
Answer:
Proponents of Freudian psychology question standard notions of “rationality.” However, we know through several scientific studies, proven, how much the standard of rationality is influential in our society because it is through it that we are able to have an effective judgment on any terms. This judgment is based on what we know and know, that is, it is based on an elaborated reality and not on a hidden reality that runs away from the standard notions of rationality.
Explanation:
A counterview is an opinion contrary to a previously exposed thought. Based on this, as was asked in the question, a counterview was given to the statement given in the question, presenting facts that justify the rejection of the previous argument and showing why it should not be accepted.
A counterview should always be done calmly and politely, presenting concise, consistent and efficient information about the topic.
Answer:
It is a science fiction short story about the Second Law of Thermodynamics.
