Answer:
<h2>direct democracy</h2><h2>Issues and controversies</h2><h2>Discussions on direct-democratic institutions deal with several issues. The strongest normative grounds for direct democracy are the democratic principles of popular sovereignty, political equality, and all the arguments for participative democracy that support the idea that all citizens should have the right not only to elect representatives but also to vote on policy issues in referenda. Since assembly democracy cannot be an option in modern societies (outside Switzerland), direct-democratic institutions are regarded not as a full-scale alternative to representative democracy but as a supplement to or counterweight within democratic systems with major representative features. Nevertheless, the institutional difference and competition between representative and direct-democratic processes lie at the core of the controversy whether direct democracy contributes to undermining representative democracy or can offer enrichments of democracy.</h2>
<h3>Explanation:</h3>
<h3>correct me if I'm wrong</h3><h3>please brainless my answer</h3>
Answer:
Portuguese dominated the trade in the Indian Ocean which forms the first triangle and then they dominated trade from South America to Europe which is the other triangle
Explanation: Portuguese dominated the trade in the Indian Ocean as they were the ones making laws about the trade and were responsible for the naval presence tot the separate parts from the horn of Africa to the Indian and south east Asian coasts dominating the spice trade.
Apart from this they dominated trade from South America to Europe which is the other triangle and it was very lucrative as they had been able to colonize the region well and held on to Brazil for long.
Shortages almost destroyed the American economy i believe is correct answer
Serfs, likewise might be farmers but might also be craftsmen. The difference between the two was that the peasant owned his own land, while the serf did not. The serf owed labor duties to his lord, whereas a peasant owed nothing or, more usually, owed some sort of rent.
