1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ivenika [448]
3 years ago
6

Why did Thomas Paine think the colonies stood a good chance against the British

History
2 answers:
Brums [2.3K]3 years ago
8 0
The colonies stood a good chance against the British because the colonies had the resources to create weapons easily. 
Hopefully, this worked for you. :)
Svet_ta [14]3 years ago
6 0
One reason Thomas Paine thought that the colonies stood a good chance against the British because the colonies have the resources to make weapons easily .
You might be interested in
What was the legal code for ancient Babylonian society
ch4aika [34]

The Code of Hammurabi (APEX)

4 0
3 years ago
Which legislative two would A senator most likely used to prevent a bill she dislikes from becoming law if a majority of her col
vodka [1.7K]

Answer:

A Senator can practice a filibuster to counter a bill he /she disapproves of maturing law if a majority of his/her associates support it.

Explanation:

A filibuster in the United States Senate is political derived maneuvering in which a senator discourses in order to counter a pattern from being produced to a vote. It is a slow tactic by which senators involve in lengthened debates as an effort to restrict or obstruct a vote on a bill.

5 0
3 years ago
What do both national and state governments both do?
Helen [10]
In the United States, both national and state governments "<span>Borrow money," since this money can be borrowed either from domestic sources or foreign sources (in the case of the federal government). </span>
8 0
3 years ago
Please do all the races steps. Restate, explain what it means, summaries, cite evidence, And answer the complete question. Help
JulijaS [17]
I would if I had the article
8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Source B:
Vadim26 [7]
Here is how it was explained to me. WW2 was blamed pretty much entirely in Hitler, yes obviously there were so many other factors, and decisions that made the total, destruction of everything, but everyone blames Hitler for the start of it all. In this passage though, it sounds like the blame is on the other political advisers, and his foreign minister. Like they were supposed to have pushed for more meetings, or tried to make Hitler see reason.

Hope that helps  
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The Indo-European language is thought to have originated around _____.
    8·2 answers
  • Why can two igneous rocks have the same mineral but different names?
    5·2 answers
  • What was the declared U.S. foreign policy in the 1930s?
    15·2 answers
  • Which offers the BEST description of the location of Australia's major cities and population centers?
    12·1 answer
  • How did newspaper printing change in the nineteenth century?
    7·1 answer
  • Who led movements to establish the Republic of Turkey?
    14·1 answer
  • What was one political problem during the progressive era?
    10·2 answers
  • Here is the picture
    15·1 answer
  • From 1776-1928, to what extent did America live up to ensuring that the 5 Founding Ideals were guaranteed to all of her citizens
    14·1 answer
  • How does low demand for oil affect the texas economy?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!