It means that if they say you can't do something, they're right.
if they say you can do something, they're right
Answer:
C.
Explanation:
The rhetorical device which is not used in the given paragraph is syllogism. Syllogism can be defined as a logical reasoning using deductive reasoining to reach a conclusion. But Henry David Thoreau has not used this device in the given excerpt, taken from 'Life Without Principle.'
We can see the use of personification in 'C<em>old and hunger seem more friendly...'</em> Rhetorical question can be seen when he asks <em>'Is it that men are too much disgusted with their experience to speak of it?' </em>And, allusion is seen when Henry refers to <em>'the Author of the Universe.' </em>And, parallelism is used in <em>'—whether they inherit, or earn, or steal it.'</em>
Therefore, option C is correct.
I'd say the answer is B, people are victims of circumstances. The lieutenant was shot and had to have his arm amputated. It isn't specified what the battle was about or what side he was on so we can't say it is A or C because it takes those certain details to come to the conclusions that people get what they deserve and good triumphs evil. Moreover, people cannot control what happens to them as we saw. The lieutenant got shot, something he wasn't controlling, and he had his arm amputated, something he clearly objected to but still had done. He had absolutely no control of anything throughout the story. Therefore, the only logical answer would be B
Answer:
And where is the question please
Answer:
Getaway Driver
Explanation:
Informally: The "getaway driver" was part of the gang of robbers. Formally: The "accomplice" "aided and abetted" the bank robbery. "Getaway driver" refers to the exact role you asked about. "Accomplice" is a more general term for someone who helps commit a crime.
