Answer: Yes the US should have gone to war. There are two sides to the topic, Yes and No. Yes because if we did not go to war with mexico we would not own all the present 50 states. No because war is expensive.
Explanation:
So for Yes you could write. The United States should have gone to war with mexico because, if they didn't then the United states would not be what it is today. A second reason is we needed the resources they had on there territory.
For no you could write. The United States should not have gone to war with mexico because, war is expensive for ammo and troops, a second reason is it was expensive for allies and reinforcements, and shipment.
Answer:
C. It is a time in American history from the late 18th century until the start of the Civil War.
Explanation:
As per the American history, the Antebellum Period is commonly regarded to be the time before the Civil War and after the Constitution was adopted in 1789. It was associated with the rise of abolition and the country's gradual division between the slavery supporters and abolitionists. The conquest of new territories and western expansion intensified the slavery issue and contributed to the Civil War.
The correct answer is “support for banking reform intensified”.
After the Pearl Harbor attack, the war was a major subject for the midterm elections. People were suffering because there was an industrial mobilization to convert production of civilian consumer goods to war materials. This caused a rationing program, each citizen had a limited fair share, prices control started and labor shortages concerned people.
This led to a Republican win in the midterms, the Congress controlled the home front agenda, in 1944 Congress passed new taxes to help fund the war expenses, the GI Bill to make a social reform program.
It would be A. Examples of civilizations in the Arabian Peninsula hope his helps
B. Palestinians became refugees in Syria and Lebanon.
