1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lorico [155]
3 years ago
15

Which of the following did the Harvey Company and Mary Colter not accomplish together?

History
2 answers:
Strike441 [17]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

a. They helped New Mexico become a state.  

Explanation:

Mary Colter, was an architect and designer she designed many buildings and reference spaces for the Fred Harvey Company. She was brilliantly perfectionist and talented, making her works create an image of the southwest and the new mexico, which increased tourism in the region. In addition, she helped create a market for Indian arts and crafts, as she used Indian relics for one of her most famous works.

MAXImum [283]3 years ago
4 0
They helped new Mexico become a state
You might be interested in
The Triple Alliance, also known as the Central Powers, consisted of (5 points)
denis23 [38]
I think the correct answer from the choices listed above is option B. The Triple Alliance, also known as the Central Powers, consisted of Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Italy. <span>The </span>Triple Alliance<span> was a secret agreement between Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Italy formed on 20 May 1881.</span>
8 0
3 years ago
which group would not be allowed to vote or hold elective office under the provision of wade davis bill
sergij07 [2.7K]
Former Confederate government officials :) hope this helped<3
5 0
3 years ago
The three most used means of transportation in Brazil are: trains, roads, and water. True False
miv72 [106K]

Answer:

true

Explanation:

7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Hamilton believed that a national bank was constitutional based on
OLga [1]
Implied powers and a loose interpretation of the Constitution.
5 0
3 years ago
Wilmot proviso pro slavery or anti slavery and why
koban [17]
Anti slavery because it wanted to ban slavery in the new land from the Mexican cession (i.e. the land the US acquired from the Mexican American War). However, it did not become law because not enough of congress approved probably because it was too progressive and anti slavery for the time. It went against the Missouri compromise (i.e. a law that banned slavery above a certain longitude and allowed slavery below that longitude) since a good portion of the Mexican extended below the slavery longitude. Also, many southerners wanted to expand slavery into the new territory for both economic and political reasons.
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • HURRY PLS!!!!!!!!!! who's campaign in 1980 struck a tone of optimism?????????
    14·2 answers
  • Is the governor of texas in a wheelchair?
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following is a political alliance created to protect the economic interests of Middle Eastern nations involved in o
    12·2 answers
  • Help asap please! it’s not A!
    13·1 answer
  • This "Plan" said that Congress should be made up of one house and that each state should have equal representation in Congress.
    11·1 answer
  • What impact did the French and Indian war have on colonial America?
    5·2 answers
  • Which federal policy would violate the powers reserved to the states
    12·1 answer
  • What colonial group was born out of the protests, in New England, over the Stamp
    15·1 answer
  • Classify the following as either sexual or asexual reproduction. And give the specific type if asexual.
    5·1 answer
  • What are the Problems of poverty​
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!