Answer:
All of the above
Explanation:
The key requirements of the Treaty of Paris promised both countries entrance to the Mississippi River, determined the boundaries of the United States, termed for the British abandonment of all stations within the U.S. area, required repayment of all liabilities incurred before the war, and an end to all retaliatory actions against. In the Treaty of Paris, the British Crown officially acknowledged American freedom.
Although none of these are technically exactly very true, the best answer is that "containment was successful". this is because the war ended in a military stalemate.
Trump declined to comment on who is ultimately responsible for what happened. However, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said that Washington identified some security officials and the Saudi government who believe they were involved in the death of the journalist and would take appropriate measures, including the revocation of visas to enter the country.
In case the US identifies the person responsible for the act they would have to judge it or revoke the visa so that it does not enter the country. But regarding Saudi Arabia, at first you would not have to take any action, since it is a partner country in the Middle East region, and that decision could be negative for the country.
Answer: They both have deliberative and participatory democracy.
Explanation: The both are in use of both direct democracy and representative democracy.
Answer: On February 5, 1937, President Franklin Roosevelt announces a controversial plan to expand the Supreme Court to as many as 15 judges, allegedly to make it more efficient. Critics immediately charged that Roosevelt was trying to “pack” the court and thus neutralize Supreme Court justices hostile to his New Deal. During the previous two years, the high court had struck down several key pieces of New Deal legislation on the grounds that the laws delegated an unconstitutional amount of authority to the executive branch and the federal government. Flushed with his landslide reelection in 1936, President Roosevelt issued a proposal in February 1937 to provide retirement at full pay for all members of the court over 70. If a justice refused to retire, an “assistant” with full voting rights was to be appointed, thus ensuring Roosevelt a liberal majority. Most Republicans and many Democrats in Congress opposed the so-called “court-packing” plan. In April, however, before the bill came to a vote in Congress, two Supreme Court justices came over to the liberal side and by a narrow majority upheld as constitutional the National Labor Relations Act and the Social Security Act. The majority opinion acknowledged that the national economy had grown to such a degree that federal regulation and control was now warranted. Roosevelt’s reorganization plan was thus unnecessary, and in July the Senate struck it down by a vote of 70 to 22. Soon after, Roosevelt had the opportunity to nominate his first Supreme Court justice, and by 1942 all but two of the justices were his appointees.
Explanation:
Im not a brainlyest but i wanna be. But there you go. Thats actually 260 words so i think your good.
