Answer:
The Court upheld the statute only in the case of states that could provide matching funds; and if matching funds could not be provided.
Explanation:
The case was resolved 7-2 with the majority vote wrote by the Chief Justice William Rehnquist. It stated that the statue was a valid interpretation of the Spending Clause and that it was not unconstitutional. Congress has the authority of regulating the spends but not till the point they applied coercion.
I hope this answer helps you.
Answer:
we get this from overseas way more than we make our own
1st blank: you have the right to remain silent.
2nd blank: I'm sorry I dont know
3rd blank: anything you say may be used against you in the court of the law
Answer:
shouldnt it be all of the above lol
