I need a reflection of civil contracts

Law

1 answer:

Archy [21]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

A contract is an agreement between at least two natural or legal persons – the parties, or more specifically contractors – about what they will do with each other or for each other – the performance to be delivered – or not.

Contracts must be distinguished from obligations: an agreement creates an obligation, but the reverse is not always the case. If someone inflicts damage on another, this may result in an obligation to compensate it.

Sometimes a contract has a predetermined term, the period for which it applies. These must in principle be fulfilled. If the other party does not fulfill an agreement, it can, if necessary, be enforced through the courts.

You might be interested in

Kendall Gardner agreed to buy a specially built shaving mill from B&C Shavings. He planned to use the mill to produce wood s

Maksim231197 [3]

No, it is not enforceable because neither party signed any contract.

3 0

3 years ago

Which statement best describes how due process has been applied in Supreme Court rulings?

Goshia [24]

The Supreme Court has ruled defendants have a right to due process under the law and cannot be denied the right to an attorney, nor illegal evidence used against them.

Explanation:

4 0

3 years ago

mafiozo [28]

Answer:

Explanation:

Precedent refers to a court decision that is considered as authority for deciding subsequent cases involving identical or similar facts, or similar legal issues.

8 0

2 years ago

Some of the things OSHA does to carry out its mission include; developing job safety and health standards, and enforcing them th

muminat

Answer:

Training programs

Explanation:

Training programs

7 0

4 years ago

Read this scenario applying to the Bill of Rights.

choli [55]

Answer:

Protection against unwanted search and seizure

Explanation:

Freedom of religion wasn't violated because the FBI aren't trying to prevent him from practicing his religion.

Freedom of assembly is wrong because the FBI isn't preventing them from getting each other.

Protection against unlawful accusations is also incorrect because their is no unlawful accusation in intercepting suspicious messages.

This obviously leaves protection against unwarranted searches and seizures because the FBI took Tristians phone without gaining a warrant from a judge that would legally allow them to take it.

5 0

3 years ago