Feudalism developed because European monarchs wanted to

1 answer:

6 0

The Puritans also influenced the economic well-being of the colonies by ... One particular value held by the Puritans that can still be seen today is their sense of religious ... as collective, self-government within each community or settlement. ... Their belief in self-government gave them local control over both

You might be interested in

Which of these developments did not occur before the rise of chiefdoms in Neolithic societies?

Fiesta28 [93]

<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be "ocean navigation", since these societies usually stayed where they were due to the fact that they had a surplus of food. </span></span>

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What were four rights stated in the declaration?

Vinvika [58]

Equal rights, unalienable rights, undermining the legal consensus, right to bear arms

5 0

3 years ago

Bishops of the five administrative centers for the church in the last years of the roman empire. Could you guys please help??

Rudik [331]

Answer:

Rome - Francis

Constantinople - Bartholomew I, Sahak II Mashalian

Alexandria - Ibrahim Isaac Sidrak, Theodore II, Tawadros II

Antioch - Bechara Boutros al-Rahi, Ignatius Joseph III Yonan , Joseph Absi, John X, Ignatius Aphrem II

Jerusalem - Sede vacante, Theophilos III, Nourhan Manougian

Explanation:

The model of the church organization was run by the Eastern Orthodox Church and was called Pentarchy. It was formulated by Emperor Justinian the emperor of the Roman Empire. The christian church was governed by five heads or patriarchs. These heads were called the five major episcopal sees of the Roman Empire. They were Rome, Constantinople, Alexandria, Antioch and Jerusalem.

The bishops were:

Rome - Francis

Constantinople - Bartholomew I, Sahak II Mashalian

Alexandria - Ibrahim Isaac Sidrak, Theodore II, Tawadros II

Antioch - Bechara Boutros al-Rahi, Ignatius Joseph III Yonan , Joseph Absi, John X, Ignatius Aphrem II

Jerusalem - Sede vacante, Theophilos III, Nourhan Manougian

5 0

3 years ago

How did Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. and Malcom X differ in their approaches to gaining civil rights? A. Dr. King supported worki

bezimeni [28]

It was A. Though both Martin Luther King, Jr. and Malcolm X both worked on the goal of helping blacks in their struggle for civil rights in the United States in the 1960s, their approach and speech was very different. Martin was more conciliatory in his approach. He used peaceful methods and often incorporated the teachings of the Bible. He wanted blacks and whites to coexist with each other. Malcolm on the other hand, was very aggressive in his approach. He was not afraid to lash out at what he viewed was the unfair treatment that blacks were given and encourage violent means to achieve that goal.

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

During the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, many people began to

Nat2105 [25]

People began to think independently of religious authority.

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers