Answer:
The answer is b. is a tying arrangement that may be a violation of federal antitrust law.
Explanation:
If Universal Syndication has told television stations and networks that they cannot have the rights to play program (“Friends” rerun), unless they also agree to take packages (i.e., typing of other packages), even though the television stations and networks complain that the packages do not draw viewers ,then Universal Syndication’s requirement for tying (or bundling) might be a violation of federal antitrust law because it (Universal Syndication) could be using monopoly power in one television market as an influence to control competition, and strengthen its monopoly power in another market.
I believe the answer is: motivations.
When you understand your motivations, you would most likely wouldn't stop unless your end goal is achieved because you feel a strong drive for a certain change. Because of this, the likelihood of you staying within your plan would also be increased.
Answer:
d
Explanation:
please mark as brainliest
<h2>The Answer Is:</h2><h3><u>B</u><u>:</u><u>Congress could not decide whether to allow slavery in the territories</u></h3>
Answer:
C. the US government allowed commercial banks to own stock and sell insurance policies.
Explanation:
The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) of 1999 basically repealed or revoked or cancelled the Glass-Steagall Act of 1933. The Glass-Steagall Act of 1933 forbids the commercial banks to own stock and sell insurance policies. So basically by cancelling that Glass-Steagall Act of 1933, the GLBA of 1999 allowed the commercial banks to own stock and sell insurance policies.
