Sherif’s (1966) classic Robbers Cave study of boys at summer camp finds the relationship between the two groups of boys immediately deteriorated when the event began.
In the 1940s and 1950s, social psychologist Muzafer Sherif and his associates conducted a number of investigations, including the Robbers Cave experiment. Sherif investigated the interactions between male groups at summer camps and a competitor group with the hypothesis that "when two groups have competing purposes... their members would become antagonistic to one other even when the groups are constituted of normal well-adjusted individuals at a summer camp " The Robbers Cave study found the incident swiftly escalated once the parties started throwing jabs. The Sherif discovered that the summer camps' surveys, in which they were asked to score their own team and the opposing team on good and bad attributes, contained questions about group animosity.
Learn more about Sherif here:
brainly.com/question/14407858
#SPJ9
The available options are the following:
-Board members serve on multiple boards
-People with knowledge of the firm's history are replaced with those who may not know as much information
-Less frequent board meetings
-Better decisions about important issues
Answer:
-People with knowledge of the firm's history are replaced with those who may not know as much information
Explanation:
Considering the available options, the option that appears negative and related to the point being discussed is
"People with knowledge of the firm's history are replaced with those who may not know as much information."
It is straightforward, as changing the board of directors will at some point lead to a time where the new member in the board of directors will just be a competent worker but has no history with the company.
Company A uses the FIFO method to account for inventory and Company B uses the LIFO method. The two companies are exactly alike except for the difference in inventory cost flow assumptions. The debt-to-equity ratio measures your company's total debt relative to the amount originally invested by the owners and the earnings that have been retained over time.
The debt to equity ratio using the book value of equity in 2019 would be 2.29.
Finding the debt-to-equity ratio.
This can be found by the formula:
= Interest bearing Debt / Book value of equity
= (Notes payable + Current maturities of long term debt + Long term debt) / Book value of equity
= (10.5 + 39.9 + 239.7) / 126.6
= 2.29
Learn more about debt-to-equity here
brainly.com/question/21408403
#SPj4
Answer:
ukrskyrstluustliltdild5id
5i
d5dtij
dttid
idt
iltddtlilitdild5itlditdlidltdt
idt
it
iddt
iiltditdlditlidtdt
iitldtdi
ditlidltdlit
Explanation:
uktstliutlss5i
5id
il6rrip6
6ro
6ridli6dil5d6
it
did
tidi
5dti
di
tdid
tdi
tid
i
tdoyd
id
ttid
tidl.idtltddit
tdi
dti
tid
idt
itd
dtdi
idt
it.dlitrkutdkutdutdludltudlitd
itofyyo
f
foy
rti
fo6dti6r96r
9
97r7r0
6r9
r96
9
goofy 0r
said
Answer:
- <em>Underestimating your income is a conservative and healthy measure that can avoid financial problems.</em>
Explanation:
<em>Underestimating</em> your <em>income</em> is a conservative and healthy measure, such as it is overestimating your expenses.
Specially when your income is variable iit can be hard to predict. You will be safer both if your income lowers or your unpredictable expenses increase.
There are many unpredictable situations that could put you in a difficult situation: a disease, a natural disaster, the need to help a family member or friend in trouble. If any of these unfortunate circumstances arises and your budget is too tight, you could see yourself in financial trouble.
But, if you if all is smooth you will have in a happy situation, you will have a surplus which can use for savings, for an important purchase, or for vacations.
It is better to be cautious than to regret later!
