<u>Answer</u>:
Elise Philips, a leading fashion designer, connects with her followers through a strong online presence, promoting her brand and discussing fashion tips through articles and videos on her personal fan page. In this case, the marketing forms Elise uses is (A) Blog
<u>Explanation</u>:
A word “Blog” etymologically speaking, comes from the combination of 2 words- Web and log.
Essentially, a blog is an online account or expression of the writer, and is started with people putting their private experiences online but it has now become a very popular means of promotion and is gaining popularity in most urban areas.
Blog Marketing entails using blogging websites such as Wordpress among others to promote ones’ product to the masses.
The main advantages of Blog marketing include that firstly, it is easier to manage and economically feasible, secondly, it is an effective tool of marketing, especially amongst millennial, thirdly, it gives a more personalised approach to marketing and lastly, it is a great way to improve one’s Search Engine Optimisation ranking.
The corridor is the vertical section of the supply curve of reserves in the federal fund market.
Answer:
Options 1 - 4 are True but 5 is FALSE
Explanation:
All options given are indicators of economic growth and strong economic performance
When considering the economic prospects of a country, it can be said that: 1. the advantages of building brand loyalty and gaining experience in a country's business practices is greater for a last-mover than for a first-mover <em>because the last-mover has the chance to learn from the mistakes of the first-mover and perfect on them</em>
2. countries which do not have property rights protection tend to achieve greater economic growth rates because<em> </em><em><u>prosperity and property rights are inextricably linked</u></em><em>. The importance of having well-defined and strongly protected property rights is now widely recognized among economists and policymakers</em>
3. the economic system and property rights regime are reasonably good predictors of economic prospects of a country because <em>widely accepted explanation is that </em><u><em>well-enforced property rights provide incentives for individuals to participate in economic activities, such as investment</em></u><em>, innovation and trade, which lead to a more efficient market.</em>
4. countries where property rights are not well respected and where corruption is rampant always have very low levels of economic growth because as stated in 3 above <u><em>ill-enforced property rights does not provide incentives for individuals to participate in economic activities, such as investment</em></u><em>, innovation and trade, which lead to a more efficient market.</em>
5.countries with command economies tend to achieve greater economic growth rates than free market economies.
<em>This is FALSE because one of the Command economy disadvantages include lack of competition and lack of efficiency.
</em>
<em />
Answer:
Product A, then Product C and finally Product B
Explanation:
The unit profit = Selling price per unit - Variable cost per unit - Fixed cost per unit
Unit Profit of product A = $21 - $11 - $5 = $5
Unit Profit of product B = $12 - $7 - $3 = $2
Unit Profit of product C = $32 - $18 - $9 = $5
The profit of each product in 1 machine hour = 1 hour/ Machine hours per unit * Unit Profit
Profit of Product A in 1 hour using machine = 1/0.2 * $5 = $25
Profit of Product B in 1 hour using machine = 1/0.5*$2 = $4
Profit of Product C in 1 hour using machine = 1/0.2* $5 = $25
Product A & Product C have same profit in 1 hour machine, then we have to consider Direct labor hours per unit which product A is 0.4 while product C is 0.7. It means Product C is more costly in direct labour than Product A.
In short, then the ranking of the products from the most profitable to the least profitable use of the constrained resource is Product A, then Product C and finally Product B
Answer:
Check the following calculations
Explanation:
All-Equity Plan:
Number of shares = 15,000
Plan I:
Number of shares = 12,700
Value of debt = $109,250
Price per share = Value of debt / (Number of shares under All-Equity Plan - Number of shares under Plan I)
Price per share = $109,250 / (15,000 - 12,700)
Price per share = $109,250 / 2,300
Price per share = $47.50
Plan II:
Number of shares = 9,800
Value of debt = $247,000
Price per share = Value of debt / (Number of shares under All-Equity Plan - Number of shares under Plan II)
Price per share = $247,000 / (15,000 - 9,800)
Price per share = $247,000 / 5,200
Price per share = $47.50
