1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
bekas [8.4K]
3 years ago
7

Which of the following marked the end of the Spanish-American War?

History
2 answers:
muminat3 years ago
8 0

A.  The Treaty  of Paris

Vikki [24]3 years ago
4 0
The Treaty of Paris marked the end of the Spanish American War. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is option "a" or the first option. The Treaty of Paris was signed on 3rd of September in the year 1783. I hope that this is the answer you were looking for and it has helped you.
You might be interested in
Who proposed the albany plan of union in 1754
natali 33 [55]
Benjamin Franklin was the one who did this.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
According to the constitution who elects the president answers
aliina [53]
The electoral college elects the president.
I hope this helps.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What factors would encourage people to come to America over 100 years ago?
harina [27]
The factors are:

- Job opportunities
This happen due to the adoption of industrial evolution which require many workforce to help with the production

- Land availibiulity
The government announced that settlers from outside united states could come in an purchase land on a heavily discounted prices

- Huge amount of natural resources in our territory
4 0
3 years ago
What is the purpose of the document of undelivered speech​
steposvetlana [31]

Answer: am not sure this is the answer but try it

Explanation:I seek no confrontation. I only pray and will strive for a genuine national reconciliation founded on justice.

I am prepared for the worst, and have decided against the advice of my mother, my spiritual adviser, many of my tested friends and a few of my most valued political mentors.

A death sentence awaits me. Two more subversion charges, both calling for death penalties, have been filed since I left three years ago and are now pending with the courts.

I could have opted to seek political asylum in America, but I feel it is my duty, as it is the duty of every Filipino, to suffer with his people especially in time of crisis.

I never sought nor have I been given assurances or promise of leniency by the regime. I return voluntarily armed only with a clear conscience and fortified in the faith that in the end justice will emerge triumphant.

According to Gandhi, the willing sacrifice of the innocent is the most powerful answer to insolent tyranny that has yet been conceived by God and man.

Three years ago when I left for an emergency heart bypass operation, I hoped and prayed that the rights and freedoms of our people would soon be restored, that living conditions would improve and that blood-letting would stop.

Rather than move forward, we have moved backward. The killings have increased, the economy has taken a turn for the worse and the human rights situation has deteriorated.

During the martial law period, the Supreme Court heard petitions for Habeas Corpus. It is most ironic, after martial law has allegedly been lifted, that the Supreme Court last April ruled it can no longer entertain petitions for Habeas Corpus for persons detained under a Presidential Commitment Order, which covers all so-called national security cases and which under present circumstances can cover almost anything.

The country is far advanced in her times of trouble. Economic, social and political problems bedevil the Filipino. These problems may be surmounted if we are united. But we can be united only if all the rights and freedoms enjoyed before September 21, 1972 are fully restored.

The Filipino asks for nothing more, but will surely accept nothing less, than all the rights and freedoms guaranteed by the 1935 Constitution—the most sacred legacies from the Founding Fathers.

Yes, the Filipino is patient, but there is a limit to his patience. Must we wait until that patience snaps?

The nation-wide rebellion is escalating and threatens to explode into a bloody revolution. There is a growing cadre of young Filipinos who have finally come to realize that freedom is never granted, it is taken. Must we relive the agonies and the blood-letting of the past that brought forth our Republic or can we sit down as brothers and sisters and discuss our differences with reason and goodwill?

I have often wondered how many disputes could have been settled easily had the disputants only dared to define their terms.

So as to leave no room for misunderstanding, I shall define my terms:

1. Six years ago, I was sentenced to die before a firing squad by a Military Tribunal whose jurisdiction I steadfastly refused to recognize. It is now time for the regime to decide. Order my IMMEDIATE EXECUTION OR SET ME FREE.

I was sentenced to die for allegedly being the leading communist leader. I am not a communist, never was and never will be.

2. National reconciliation and unity can be achieved but only with justice, including justice for our Muslim and Ifugao brothers. There can be no deal with a Dictator. No compromise with Dictatorship.

3. In a revolution there can really be no victors, only victims. We do not have to destroy in order to build.

4. Subversion stems from economic, social and political causes and will not be solved by purely military solutions; it can be curbed not with ever increasing repression but with a more equitable distribution of wealth, more democracy and more freedom, and

5. For the economy to get going once again, the workingman must be given his just and rightful share of his labor, and to the owners and managers must be restored the hope where there is so much uncertainty if not despair.

On one of the long corridors of Harvard University are carved in granite the words of Archibald Macleish:

“How shall freedom be defended? By arms when it is attacked by arms; by truth when it is attacked by lies; by democratic faith when it is attacked by authoritarian dogma. Always, and in the final act, by determination and faith.”

I return from exile and to an uncertain future with only determination and faith to offer—faith in our people and faith in God.

Basahin sa Filipino

4 0
3 years ago
What did men of the Roman Empire wear?
ivanzaharov [21]

Answer:

TUNIC

Explanation:

Men wore a knee-length tunic (chilton), either sleeveless or short-sleeved. Roman men wore a cloak over their TUNIC, which was like a wide shawl that was draped over the shoulder and carefully wrapped around the body. Important Romans dressed in a long robe called a toga.

HOPE THIS HELPS!!

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which event after 88 BC had the most important effect on the Romans republics government
    7·1 answer
  • The state where most of the early French immigrants settled is _______.
    15·1 answer
  • What is 90 miles south of florida and has a communist government?
    5·1 answer
  • In multilateral interactions with other countries the united states would most likley attempt
    14·1 answer
  • What kind of power does the Senate have more of than the House of Representatives?
    15·2 answers
  • What kinds of court cases are heard by federal courts? Name at least three.
    8·1 answer
  • A monarch is a ruler who had absolute control over people without having to confer with others
    9·2 answers
  • Which group used the stirrup, skilled horsemanship, and siege warfare techniques to conquer much of Asia and part of Europe in t
    13·2 answers
  • okay yall we finna play other game of khoot so if you want to play join this metting id code 365 566 9069 password macei12
    14·2 answers
  • What did the policy of appeasement result in?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!