Answer:
<u>less risk</u>
Explanation:
Note: <u>The question appears to be incomplete. Another similar question has been attached for reference purpose and the answer provided herein is based upon that</u>.
It is common consumer behavior of sticking to a brand name despite another lower cost option providing the same base or constituent. Particularly in case of necessities, the law of demand i.e lower price higher demand fails as consumer would prefer being exposed to lesser risk no matter whatever be the cost.
In the given case, the consumer i.e Cole prefers going with a brand name as it provides him with a higher degree of assurance as the brand has a certain reputation attached to it which the other generic option lacks.
Secondly owing to his familiarity with the drug and it's past usage experience, he has developed brand loyalty apparently.
Thus, Cole's decision is attributable to <u>less risk.</u>
Answer:
Effect : Increase in Break Even units by 3,750 units to 18,750 units
Explanation:
Break even point is the level of activity at which a firm makes neither a profit nor a loss
Break even Point (Units) = Fixed Costs ÷ Contribution per unit
where,
Contribution per unit = Selling price per unit - Variable Costs per unit
= $12 - $8
= $4
Therefore,
<u>Before Increase</u>
Break even Point (Units) = $60,000 ÷ $4 = 15,000
<u>After Increase</u>
New Contribution = $12 - ($8× 1.10)
= $3.20
Therefore,
Break even Point (Units) = $60,000 ÷ $3.20 = 18,750
Answer:
minimum call objective
Explanation:
For Victor, the sale of the less expensive ready-made profile sander is his minimum call objective. This term refers to the first basic business purpose that the sales-person has to accomplish in order for their sales pitch to be considered a success. Therefore since Victor is willing to accept selling the less expensive sander when making the call then that is his minimum call objective.
B because if you don't save it it will be lost in your computer
Answer:
It is better used to locate things.
Explanation: