Answer: I Honestly think the answers D.
Explanation:
Alberto determined one of the metrics he would use to gauge the level of exposure his marketing message had with his target market was the number of times the target was exposed to his message throughout the six weeks of the campaign, representing its "frequency" is represented by this.
<h3>What is the market frequency?</h3>
- The likelihood that a particular consumer will see an advertisement during a marketing campaign is known as frequency.
- A person is more likely to engage with the advertisement in a meaningful way and to interact with your business on a number of different levels if they are exposed to it more frequently.
<h3>What is Marketing?</h3>
- Marketing describes the actions a business does to encourage the purchase or sale of a good or service.
- Advertising, selling, and delivering goods to customers or other firms are all included in marketing.
- Affiliates perform some marketing on behalf of a business.
Learn more about market frequency here:
brainly.com/question/15591335
#SPJ4
Answer:
the answer is (C) both of the choices would produce the same return
Answer:
D) An illusory promise
Explanation:
An illusory promise is not enforceable. Illusory promises are simply illusions that seem or appear to a contract, but are not.
In this case, there is no consideration at all, therefore none of the parties is bound by a contract. It would be different if the company promised to pay a bonus if its profits are xx%. How can someone determine what is considered high profits, and how can you be sure that management will agree?
It is basically like telling someone else that you will give them something if you are happy and willing to do it. How can someone determine if you are happy or not, and how can someone know if you are willing to do it or not?
Answer:
Ten pounds of chicken to trade for at least <u>40</u> pounds of vegetables but not more than<u> 50</u> pounds of vegetables
Explanation:
Vegetables Chicken Trade Off Ratio
John 40 10 4:1 (40/10) or 1:0.25 (10/40)
George 25 5 5:1 (25/5) or 1:0.20 (5/25)
John has comparative advantage in Chicken and George has comparative advantage in Veggies because :
- John's chicken opportunity cost, in veggies < George (4<5). George's veggies opportunity cost, in chicken < John (0.20<0.25).
- George is more (5X) productive in veggies than chicken, than John (4X). John is less unproductive in chicken than veggies (1/4th), compared to George (1/5th).
So, John will sell Chicken to George & George will sell veggies to John. Gains from trade are when each get trade ratio better than their their own trade off ratio.
- It implies: John gets >' 4 pounds veggies per chicken pound' and George gets > '0.20 pound chicken per veggie pound'.
- Unitary method:- '1chicken : 4veggies' = '10chickens : 40veggies' and '0.20chicken : 1veggie' = '10chickens : 50 veggies' .
